• freebread
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    As someone who was let down by Jirard’s choice to double down and threaten his accusers, I actually don’t think he needs to be removed. If anything, the fact that his role in the game is to take donations becomes more of a snarky meta commentary. I get that Sabotage studio is probably really hurt by this given their close relationship with IndieLand, and they have every right to do whatever they want with their art, but experiencing the irony here should be preserved and available to the public.

    • icermiga@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I heard that it’s an internet joke that his character asks for donations, in fact what he actually says in-game is something else.

      • freebread
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I got to the part where he asked for building plans- seemed like donations would be the next part of the quest but my Game Pass sub ran out 😅

    • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      I get if they dont want an homage character to become a biting satire of a former business partner. Especially if they dont want someone to not get the bit, and think less of the game for having a known scammer cameo in it

      Not that its really even their fault, seeing as this came out before the charity mess did

  • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Having kept up on the drama I’m sure Jirard was devastated by this. He’s built a brand on being a nice guy, but be it by malfeasance, or incompetence he screwed up royaly. Hope we get the full story and find out he and his family are just idiots, not criminals. Especially with it all steming from his mother’s illness.

    • simpleOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      The evidence does point to just pure incompetence but it’s hard to believe he didn’t know that none of the money had been sent over the past decade, especially since he claimed multiple times they spent it. If not him, someone in the charity must’ve stolen the money and lied to him. Guess we’ll wait and see.

      • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        So we don’t know the whole story, but he was removed from the game, anyway? Not cool.

        Thierry can do whatever he wants with his game, but ending a long and profitable (both emotionally and financially, presumably) friendship simply because of unproven allegations seems like a very short-sighted, fear-driven move.

        They did it to protect the brand or whatever, but actions like this harm the brand in my eyes. Shows they care more about public perception than truth and justice. I, for one, will be removing Sea of Stars from my wishlist because of this.

        Unless Thierry comes out and says he knew all along about The Completionist, which is literally the only way to justify such a preemptive sanction, he has irreparably harmed his integrity, IMO.

        • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          That the Open Hand charity screwed up bad. Jirard’s character was a guy that took donations to complete charitable works. The real life charity took all the donations and held them for 10 years while telling everybody that their money was going directly to charities for research. They listed multiple charities that they work with that they had never worked with. These are indisputable facts and at the very least should be enough to justify this removal.

          To add to that, it seems like they were at least procrastinating in their donations. They claimed that it was to find a charity that would use all the money donated exclusively for research but the charity they finally donated to allows that for any amount if you ask. The donation was made a month after being called out for not donating for 10 years.

          • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Okay, yeah, that’s pretty bad. Thanks for expanding my understanding. I’d never actually heard any of these names other than Sea of Stars before this post, so I came in pretty blind.

            Honestly, I was more airing my frustration with what seemed at first glance like a very similar situation to the whole Justin Roiland thing from earlier this year. He got kicked off his own shows based on what turned out to be false allegations, and never got so much as a public apology.

            I’ll still wait to pass judgement until more is known, but I at least see that the content removal wasn’t purely done out of fear of public response.

            • BiggestBulb@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Not here to comment on the Justin Roiland thing, just here to say you should watch Karl Jobst on the whole Completionist controversy

              • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                So he’s an asshole. That’s pretty on-brand for him. Doesn’t make him guilty or deserving of getting hit with the cancel stick.

                • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Making comments like that and worse to young teenage fans makes him look a lot like a predator. You should read some of the text exchanges where he’s encouraging girls who he’s been talking to for years and have just turned 18 to hang out and get drunk with him.

                • Facebones@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I don’t think I’ll ever understand you people who exist in this weird venn crossover of “This is America it’s their right to perv on teens/be a bigot/whatever other skeevy shit” and “You’re literally infringing on their freedom if you decide you don’t want to work with somebody, you should be forced to do business with them regardless of how terrible or toxic they are”

          • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            But, what about the golf event money? Where’s the rest of the money for those events?

            Jirard’s donation of the money they have is an attempt to distract from the real embezzlement crimes. They stole money. The math doesn’t add up. And now they want you to believe that 100% of the money was just sitting in a bank account for 10 years that they finally donated.

            • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              It doesn’t add up because we have zero internal numbers. He already admitted the donations went towards paying for the events so why couldn’t it be possible that the numbers reported are what they are because of all the money spent on the events. It doesn’t make it right in the least since Jirard was saying all the money was going to the charity, but it is a possible explanation aside from embezzlement.

              • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                He already admitted the donations went towards paying for the events

                Those gaps are too wide for just the event costs. And even if it was, I would still suspect embezzlement, in the style of Hollywood accounting.

                • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Possibly but I’m trying my best to not make any statements that do not have concrete proof.

              • icermiga@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                The event costs is embezzlement -the donations were taken with a promise they wouldn’t be spent on that, and paying for the event means paying for content for his channel, paying to promote his channel, paying to expand his subscriber base, etc.

                Compare it to a non-charity event on his channel. He makes content, he takes the money from subscriptions. A “charity event” would then be when he makes content and instead of taking money from subscriptions, he donates it. If the “charity event” is still him making content, and him still taking money from subscriptions, then that’s more like a non-charity event. Even if a donation is made with some of the money then the event is still a non-charity event in the sense that he said he was donating the event itself, i.e. not being compensated for it - if he’s being compensated for the event then he didn’t donate “the event”, he was employed for the event.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Its kinda funny to criticize someone for supposed preemptive action by yourself making a preemptive action.

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Fully applies here, because the legal documents that the charity has posted for the past decade are more than the ample amount of evidence to drop jirard like a hot stone.

              Jirard claims the reason why he lied for a decade about donating the money instead of hoarding it like a dragon is sheer incompetence. Many people think that is a lie, and its actually a long con he was in on the while time.

              But regardless of if he was actively evil or just horridly incompetent with the money of hundreds of thousands of trusting fans, both explanations are full reasons to cut contact with him on a business and personal level.

              What company wants jirard the “10 year long charity fumbler” completionist as a partner? Who would intentionally advertise that they work with either the charity scammer or the guy who didnt realize his charity wasnt a charity for a decade?

              So a completely rational business cuts ties with a bad business partner. And you respond by misreading an internet comment, and taking the game out of your wishlist.

              • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yeah, and if you look further down, you’ll see I was ignorant of that until another commenter informed me, then I changed my tune accordingly.

                Regardless, there was nothing preemptive on my end. “Preemptive” means taking preventive action in anticipation of something possible in the future. I was reactive; I saw the content removal as morally wrong, and reacted with a small personal protest (which, granted, I didn’t edit out of my original comment, but have since rescinded). Nothing preemptive about it.

                Semantics are fun!

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Yes, and so was the removal of jirard from sea of stars. Reacting to the knowledge that jirard mishandled his charity. Thats why it was funny. Because you mislabeled what they did while doing the same thing they did.

                  Im sorry, I didnt think that part needed spelling out.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah it’s hard to speculate right now and we may never know. Jirard’s story changed so much between the phone call and his YouTube response. Much like you given the nature of where this stemmed from I’d like to attribute it to screwing up than anything else because it’s pretty dark otherwise.

    • simpleOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Check your profile settings and make sure you have all languages enabled, including undetermined

  • CluckN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I feel Charity Controversy downplays him preventing over $30,000 in donations.