• ShadowRam@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I hate this stupid word ‘drone’

    Cruise missiles have all the same navigation and course correction tech in it.

    These are the same thing with a propeller instead of a rocket and less payload.

    • CompostMaterial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, there is a difference. You even pointed it out. With a rocket you go point A to point B. That is it. With a prop, you can fly around for as long as your fuel supply lasts. Which is what makes it a drone.

      • ShadowRam@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        These only go from point A to to point B.

        rockets can fly around for as long as their fuel supply lasts.

      • mercano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        A Tomahawk cruise missile only uses a rocket motor to take off from a ship or submarine. After launch, it unfolds its wings and uses a jet engine to fly to its target.

        • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          “Added unfolding wings for effect of cool.”

          Seriously though, Rocket and jet engine is heavy. I know that from KSP.

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Cruise missiles are usually self-guided. Drones are often remotely piloted with some autonomous functions (loitering, station keeping, return to base). No idea what the case is for these new AQ400 units. Given the usage of the term “drone”, my guess is that these will be remotely piloted.