Senator and rep are both offices, why list those and not POTUS? I’m not saying I agree with this logic, but I don’t see it as unreasonable to interpret listing some high importance positions but not the most important position as not including that position.

But there is also the question of whether he even took an oath that counts for this amendment.

having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,

He certainly was not a member of Congress, and the court has argued before that we don’t elect “officers” so the POTUS wouldn’t fall under this.

Then there is even the more vague question as to whether or not he took part in an insurrection. I’m not as familiar with the legal arguments here, as it think the previous two are easier outs for them.

Believe me, I think he should be ineligible, I’m just pointing out that there are reasonable interpretations of the amendment as written that seem to give the courts an out, and I think they’ll take it.