pacjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 11 months agoI absolutely love VideoLAN's stance regarding patentslemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down113
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1imageI absolutely love VideoLAN's stance regarding patentslemmy.dbzer0.compacjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squareirmoz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·11 months ago I don’t understand why, legally speaking, a distinction is made. You don’t understand why the law distinguishes between a piece of digital art and Photoshop itself? Come on, dude.
minus-squareTheGalacticVoidlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoThat wasn’t the question at hand, but okay. You can patent things made with software, just not the software algorithms themselves.
You don’t understand why the law distinguishes between a piece of digital art and Photoshop itself? Come on, dude.
That wasn’t the question at hand, but okay.