• dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    He was running away. There are three beats. Cass is a street rat, a gambler. When he gets in trouble he lies and runs away aimlessly. Second beat, he is a rebellion pawn, a mercenary. He does things for money. He still wants to run away, but now he has an aim of exploiting the rebellion for personal gain, he’s learned focus. Third beat is rebel spy Cass. He has felt first hand the oppression and evil schemes of the empire. He loses a loved one due to the empire and now, instead of running away, as old Cass would’ve done. He is ready to face the empire and act, he’s acquired purpose and conviction. The third arc makes no sense and is not compelling in the slightest without the first and second arcs.

    • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      So your take is that it’s just a poorly written story that’s overly reliant on an excessively drawn out and tedious prologue? That sounds like we’re in agreement! I understand why all the things that happen at the beginning of the story are there, I just don’t understand why they took 4 full episodes to tell us 20 minutes worth of backstory. It feels like they didn’t have enough written to fill 12 episodes so someone panicked and just dragged it out as long as possible.