Look at congressmen. They are paid a solid salary + allowed to insider trade all they want.
Yet you can still buy a vote with a ~5k campaign contribution.
Truly the height of intellectual discourse. If you want to be understood, why stop short of your full meaning? That said, I got the sarcasm and cynicism in your response and I’m guessing that was really the point
Lol what? The best talent? Immune to corruption? Are you kidding me?
If you don’t care enough to elaborate then you’re just trolling -_-
Look at congressmen. They are paid a solid salary + allowed to insider trade all they want. Yet you can still buy a vote with a ~5k campaign contribution.
If you can’t infer what I’m saying from what I’ve said then that’s on you.
Or maybe you didn’t say anything at all .
I guess you’ll never know!
Truly the height of intellectual discourse. If you want to be understood, why stop short of your full meaning? That said, I got the sarcasm and cynicism in your response and I’m guessing that was really the point
We know exactly what you said, and it was fucking stupid.
Your lack of ability to communicate properly is solely a you problem.
You are not necessarily wrong.
But then, the parent poster’s comment could be interpreted in two ways: the way you interpreted, or also the way in which both sentences are separate.
As in, we need to increase their salaries to attract the best talent and [we need to] make them immune to corruption.