Massachusetts’ law prohibiting the possession and sale of some semiautomatic weapons commonly used in mass shootings is acceptable under a recent change to Second Amendment precedent from the US Supreme Court, a federal judge said Thursday.
Lol yes he did, he even calls out having fought a war against a standing army… please provide me differently writings from him that says otherwise. The NRA can burn, stop thinking you’re discussing this with someone who is a Republican NRA member…
And yes I’m somehow a right wing supporter who is pro choice and wants single payer healthcare…you still haven’t provided anything that refutes what I have. So at this point I’ll assume you’re just a troll.
Lol yes he did, he even calls out having fought a war against a standing army… please provide me differently writings from him that says otherwise. The NRA can burn, stop thinking you’re discussing this with someone who is a Republican NRA member…
Oh so even further right?
This is one of the most famous bits of revisionist history from the gun lobby.
O so you have nothing?
And yes I’m somehow a right wing supporter who is pro choice and wants single payer healthcare…you still haven’t provided anything that refutes what I have. So at this point I’ll assume you’re just a troll.
Dude for all that you’re sure carrying a lot of water in revising the whole federalist v anti- federalist debate for the gun lobby.
So still nothing huh?