Massachusetts’ law prohibiting the possession and sale of some semiautomatic weapons commonly used in mass shootings is acceptable under a recent change to Second Amendment precedent from the US Supreme Court, a federal judge said Thursday.
Aside from wanting to own cool guns, does that push the argument against assault weapons back to the insurrection camp?
There’s the group of people who believe that part of the motivation behind the allowance of militia arms was to allow the possibility of armed revolution since that took place and allowed the Merica we have.
Regardless of original intent, if only handguns were legal in America, would that eliminate the cause/need to seek modifying the 2nd amendment or achieve the safety goals you want or you think society wants?
Aside from wanting to own cool guns, does that push the argument against assault weapons back to the insurrection camp?
There’s the group of people who believe that part of the motivation behind the allowance of militia arms was to allow the possibility of armed revolution since that took place and allowed the Merica we have.
Regardless of original intent, if only handguns were legal in America, would that eliminate the cause/need to seek modifying the 2nd amendment or achieve the safety goals you want or you think society wants?