Whoa if true.

  • Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d actually consider that. It’d depend on the shoes and the price. At present, I’m running about 1,500km a year. My shoes are $260 (unless I can find them on sale) and I get around 1,000km out of each pair. That works out at around $10-15 per week on shoes.

    I doubt whoever is renting shoes out is charging that much for the service.

      • Nath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s probably too much. Even though it’s roughly what I’m paying now. While the subscription commitment would encourage me to make sure I was running to get value for it, the risk of not owning my shoes and the service being timely with replacements wouldn’t offset the stability I have now of just owning my shoes.

        In short, I can’t see who this would be better for.

        • Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They have a sustainability angle, which I guess is what would drive most to subscribe. The company would probably argue they need a subscription model to ensure people return the shoes regularly so they can recycle them, but it would be good if they could find a way to do this without removing the consumer’s right to ownership.