• oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 months ago

    Those rental bikes/scooters are stupid though. I see them block wheelchair ramps and sidewalks all the time. And yes I did pick it up and throw it in the bushes.

    • showmustgo [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re wrong about the bikes. Inexpensive rental bicycles are a great solution to a myriad of problems. And for every bike parked in a wheelchair ramp there is 10 cars blocking handicap parking.

      • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        They’re great when they’re run by the city and there’s designated spots to park/charge them. Our city does have one such program, but that doesn’t stop the bazingabrains from littering the sidewalks with their versions. There’s also the issue that they externalize all the losses by “renting” the bikes to 3rd parties who have to go around at night charging the things and eat the losses when they get broken/stolen.

        • showmustgo [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I disagree, my city has the dedicated drop off zones and guess what, they’re ALL on the sidewalks. Maybe it wouldn’t be so bad if pedestrians were more than an afterthought (compared to cars). Ideally, the rental bikes should be allowed to park wherever, including (especially?) in car parking spaces.

          Not sure why you take issue with a company’s profits being centered around maintaining the bikes. “Externalizing the losses” is not a meaningful expression - both companies are profiting from the relationship.

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Probably up to localities to legislate that rental bikes must have designated return locations and fine the companies for violations. Hitting the techbro’s bank accounts is the only way to make them think about externalities.

          • GinAndJuche [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            The only socially acceptable way. Giving every tech bro a e-biking funeral where they get cast off to sea on a raft of lithium ion batteries would certainly be satisfying

      • alexandra_kollontai [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        The bikes are stupid because money spent to ride them is going away to a foreign (i.e. American) tech company. It is another marker of the corporate encroaching itself into public property. Often these vehicles arrive on the streets unconsensually.

      • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        The bikes are stupid because they were designed to be left on the sidewalk instead of having designated charging/parking areas. The city bikes are better and were designed to be left at docking locations, which also solves the charging issues.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Where I was at when they had the city-owned bikes, no one would use them because the locations to drop them off were not where anyone wanted to go, they were nearly unused and stolen often. When lime bike came they were everywhere and hugely popular, we did have the problems with the sidewalks being blocked though and I moved a bike at least a couple times to help an elderly person get past it. If the city could coordinate a program better it could be great, it’s almost like they’ve done it bad on purpose just to help encourage more privatization, which is a common tactic.

      • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Because the rental companies were all created by bazingabrains who don’t care about externalities and never contacted the communities they just dump these things in. There aren’t designated zones in place to park these things and even if there were the market is oversaturated by a bunch of VC subsidized companies. The app has the ability to detect when you leave them in a bad spot but won’t actually enforce anything.

        • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          There aren’t designated zones in place to park these things and even if there were the market is oversaturated by a bunch of VC subsidized companies.

          Bollocks to that, you could replace every 10th parking spot with bike / scooter parking and that’d be an entirely solved issue. The thing is if you park them somewhere that people think of as car parking space, so most of everything, they’ll just huck these things on the sidewalk.

          All your other points apply to cars, too, is the point. Sure, at best these’d be a municipal service instead of 10 carbon copies of the same business running them at the same time, but looking at the above picture and thinking “boy those rental scooter / bikes sure are stupid” is missing the forest for the trees here.