• LWD
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, opinions on morality… I think the whole artificial paywalling should be abolished as being against the public interest. A large faction here seems to take a very right-wing view on property, including copyrights, and will always side with owner.

      How would you turn your moral intuition into a general law?

      • LWD
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • General_Effort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Tricky intuition. It would mean that authors could not transfer all rights. In that sense, it would limit what they can do with their output. Depending on how far you want to take this, it might not matter or it might not matter a lot. EG how much would you pay for the rights to an ebook if the author can always go and create a legal torrent?

          Do you really think it should matter if the new owner is an individual or a corporation? If you only limit corporations, then the rights will simply be transferred to individuals.