• zerofk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The points made in the article are that server admins should have policies regarding privacy and data retention, that users should be aware of this possibility, and that developers should ensure more of the users’ data is encrypted at all times.

    • starlinguk@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should also be held accountable and not turn a blind eye to illegal behaviour on their server. If someone uses their server to organise a terrorist attack, they’ve facilitated it.

      • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah the age old bullshit.

        “Hey, I kinda care about my rights–”

        “FUCK YOU, YOU’RE AIDING TERRORISTS AND PEDOPHILES”

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, that’s not even remotely related to the scenario in the article. It wasn’t even related to the server. The admin was raided for an entirely different reason.

        Yes, if you commit crimes you should be held responsible. No one said otherwise at any point. So, I guess thanks captain obvious?