As per title, focusing on Now feels very similar to mindful meditation where you focus on current sensations to stay in the now. Is there a difference I’m missing?

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Other than terminology, no.

    For some people the term meditation has religious overtones that does not sit well with them so psychologists will often teach the practise without using the term to avoid negative reactions from people who have other faiths.

  • treefrog
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The major difference is the source.

    Buddhism is a lineage stretching back to the Buddha of spiritual teachings and meditation techniques being offered in the spirit of giving.

    Eckhart Tolle on the other hand is a hack that got rich cobbling together other people’s teachings. It’s also pretty obvious he still has an ego if you’ve read both Buddhist sutras and any of Eckhart’s books (which is fine unless you’re making a fortune selling people on how enlightened you are).

    If you’re interested in mindfulness meditation there’s a ton of free resources basically. If you’re interested in Eckhart, buy his books or take his seminars!

    Much different spiritual energy.

    • sylverstream@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Thanks! I’ve stopped the book half way, I couldn’t continue. Too much ego indeed. Also the stuff about molecules changing if you live in the Now and living longer was absurd.

  • spiderwort
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sounds like vipassana meditation.

    We basically have 2 kinds of meditation.

    In the first (concentration) we pick a piece of the now and hold our attention upon that.

    In the second (vipassana) we do that to the whole now, without choosing any particular part.