• meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hmm. Maybe minors shouldn’t be working in that type of role if they can’t be photographed at work then? It’s a job in a business that serves the public, photography has to be assumed.

    • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I am getting downvoted in another thread for pointing out that in Canada it’s illegal to identify minors taking part in, or convicted of a crime. So I am not pro-nazi, just that we view those children as victims as well. People get weird about this stuff.

    • linuxdweeb
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m not saying it’s illegal, just that it’s fucking creepy to take pictures of children like that. I know Lemmy is full of old weirdos, but this is just gross.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s creepy only if you assume malice on behalf of the photographer.

        It’s also creepy that you assume malice on behalf of the photographer.

        That kid is in full uniform and is a public-facing agent of the restaurant and the franchise. In the US.

        That is the priority issue here. That is the first part of this that never should be happening in the 2020s.