It wasn’t the sheriff, the sheriff’s son, or the sheriff’s son’s friends.

  • Lem Jukes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Guy has to be connected to the sherif in some way right? Or is he genuinely pulling a double bluff and this was his intended outcome of the theft, ie national attention?

    • athos77@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The paper says the guy isn’t connected to the cops, the suspects, or their families. Someone in another thread speculated that it might be someone connected to the victim.

      • quindraco
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Has to be the victim, they’re the only party left.