• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    CDC has a whole thing on it

    Circumcised men compared with uncircumcised men have also been shown in clinical trials to be less likely to acquire new infections with syphilis (by 42%), genital ulcer disease (by 48%), genital herpes (by 28% to 45%), and high-risk strains of human papillomavirus associated with cancer (by 24% to 47% percent)

    By all means, you should still wrap that shit. But if you’re living in a rural community or one that has a strong stigma against contraception, or you’re just in a place where the disease is rampant and you need a secondary precautionary policy, this will have a meaningful impact on disease spread.

    • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      The majority of US citizens do not fall into those categories, and for that reason I see it as an unnecessary procedure that is more cultural than scientific.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The majority of US citizens do not fall into those categories

        They did once, and they very well might in the near future, depending on how we handle legal contraception going forward.