The resulting map shows huge swaths of deeply disadvantaged locations across the nation’s 3,000 counties, places that are mostly located outside of the largest U.S. cities yet which share some traits: A history of resource extraction, unequal educational opportunities, a breakdown of social bonds, violence and local corruption.

  • ATQOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The “colonies” described in this study are the heart of rural, red, America. If you want to see conservative politics in action, this is where you find it.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Car dependent, nothing but fast food, poor infrastructure, few jobs, zero entertainment, a severe lack of healthcare facilities, bad schools, and more.

      Rural America is being left behind and it’s because they keep voting for Republicans who absolutely do not care about their well-being.

      • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because those of us who could vote with our feet DID. Stop blaming those left behind. If you improve those areas, a lot of us would go back home and you’d see the politics change.

        • tacosplease@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are the voters not responsible for the people they elect? Why should they be free of blame just because they can’t afford to move away?

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I live in Ohio and you can definitely see this if you focus in on the state. Cleveland has a massive medical industry but the rural parts of the state it’s like a completely different world.

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Was wondering how this would be spun as “republican bad”. There we have it.

      Poor people don’t get as healthy food, as good exercise, living conditions, or medical care as rich people. I am shocked. SHOCKED.

      • ATQOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re correct. It’s well known and documented that educated and successful people live in cities and vote left. Poor, uneducated people live in rural American and vote right. If you don’t like the results of ‘Pub policies then maybe you ought to examine why you keep voting for them. Until then, it’s informative for the average reader to understand reality. Even if reality hurts your own personal feelings.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re just making dumb assumptions. Not American, not a republican, not a conservative. There are lots and lots of poor and uneducated people living in cities and voting left. You’ll find lots of them sleeping on the street in those cities too.

      • w00tabaga
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My thoughts were the same.

        Like no shit poor people are going to have a lower life expectancy.

        Then I see OPs comment. I can’t say I’m surprised.

        To some people all the worlds problems belong to one political party, it’s just their worldview. Republicans are just as guilty. Republicans act like you’re oppressing them if you express yourself in any way they don’t approve of.

        I got called a Nazi by multiple people on a non political sub the other day because I said I was left on social issues but was right on some economic issues.

        Like I said, either way it’s very closed minded imo.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And huge swaths of those “colonies” regularly vote against their own interests and actively work to enable well connected politicians and businesses to kneecap them in the name of having the last word or just out of good old fashioned racism.

    • torknorggren
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some, yes, but many are black, Native Americans, and Mexican Americans who have been systematically disenfranchised. Really the only places in the study that fit your description are in coal country.

      • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        And also, there’s a majority there now because those of us who could vote with our feet did.

        I’m part of the Appalachian diaspora. I grew up knowing my extended family closely and now we’re all spread across the country, leaving none of us at home to vote sensibly. The dismantling of my family structure and so many others like me is a silent tragedy of the past two generations.

        • torknorggren
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a good point, I wonder if the authors address it. Richard Florida, the geographer, argues that geographic mobility is a strong prediction of success. Places full of people who have never moved are often worse off.

    • krayj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Glad somebody mentioned that this disparity is very largely and collectively self inflicted. It’s not necessarily because they are stupid but because their various unproductive hatreds are so easily exploited.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Western states, aside from the literal west coast, do operate much like colonies.

      Most of their initial economies were based around resource extraction, and that’s still mostly true today. The companies that own the mines and oil fields and such, aren’t headquartered anywhere near those states. Resources are extracted, and then shipped off elsewhere to be processed into something.