• Yer Ma
    83·
    10 months ago

    Oof, I don’t think that’s his best work

    • Andy@slrpnk.netOP
      37·
      10 months ago

      That’s kind of a crappy thing to say.

      You could just say, “I really like his work.”

      • Gnorv@feddit.de
        72·
        10 months ago

        To me it seems like not so harsh ciritisism, perfectly okay.

        • Andy@slrpnk.netOP
          21·
          10 months ago

          My complaint isn’t that it’s harsh: it’s that it’s non constructive.

          Good criticism offers encouragement to improve something. Just saying something is disappointing to you is really just discouraging.

      • Yer Ma
        51·
        10 months ago

        I do like his work, but this one seems almost like it wasn’t finished or something, the details look odd and it just isn’t great compared

        • Andy@slrpnk.netOP
          11·
          10 months ago

          It’s actually not complete: it’s the background. The full image will debut in a day or so, I just wanted to build anticipation.

          But that’s beside the point. The point is that saying you don’t like a piece of art is non-constructive criticism. I think it’s discouraging and unkind to artists to offer criticism that isn’t in some way constructive.

          • Yer Ma
            32·
            10 months ago

            Since when is it not okay to criticize art?

            • Andy@slrpnk.netOP
              2·
              10 months ago

              I think it’s discouraging and unkind to artists to offer criticism that isn’t in some way constructive.

              I think criticism is great: when it’s constructive.

              That’s when you say what you’d like to make the art better. To issue constructive criticism, all you have to do is say WHAT you don’t like, so that the artist can learn and – assuming they want to make art you like better next time – incorporate that feedback. That’s what constructive criticism means.

            • Moira_Mayhem@beehaw.org
              2·
              10 months ago

              Actual art criticism is a bit more nuanced and based on a fundamental grounding of understanding with the medium.

              If you walk up to a Jackson Pollock painting and say ‘That’s bad’, literally no one interested in painting will call your statement art criticism.

              • Yer Ma
                1·
                10 months ago

                But… Jackson Pollock’s ‘art’ is bad

                  • Yer Ma
                    3·
                    10 months ago

                    Come on, who hasn’t been to the MOMA? Honestly I was kinda joking, I’m not a fan of abstract splatter-type arts, to me that kind of thing seems incredibly self centered of the artist and ofter low effort or wasted effort without conveying a universal beauty of any kind and instead forcing viewers to have to accept that the artist must have seen something that they don’t… It’s not friendly or inviting as an experience for anyone that isn’t in the “know”, you know?