Steve Bannon is in a tight spot. He didn’t pay his lawyer, got sued, and now his finances might be subject to review. The problem is, there might be evidence of fraud there.
No need to lock in to a distributor. Just make it, “no paywalls”. I know you probably mean it that way, but it’s the only reason I can think of for getting voted down off of the same opening sentiment that’s at least on the positive side of reception.
No need to lock in to a distributor. Just make it, “no paywalls”. I know you probably mean it that way, but it’s the only reason I can think of for getting voted down off of the same opening sentiment that’s at least on the positive side of reception.
That’s true, and yes, that is what I meant. Thanks