Okay, so we are having a public enquiry now?

From the article, it sounds like there were a number of allegations that Johnston didn’t investigate, so that makes sense.

Getting the opposition parties to agree on the head of the enquiry before it starts seems like a good idea.

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why just Chinese interference? Let’s have a public inquiry and get it all out in the open. Including US interference which will be found to dwarf every other state’s interference by an order of magnitude. Unless someone can point out another country that owns as much media in Canada (Postmedia, anyone?)

    • sbv@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The NDP is talking about increasing scope to include other states.

      I’m pretty sure a foreign agent registry (of implemented properly) would cover any and all state actors.

      • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it just me that cares about institutional influence and not just state influence? They’re equally dangerous given the power and political associations of many of these institutions.

      • AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Expanding the scope is a stall tactic that will ensure this thing is dragged out for the next 10+ years