TikTok has been pushing Chinese propaganda to millions of users in Europe: analysis::More than 1,000 ads from Chinese state media outlets have run on European users’ TikTok feeds since October 2022, according to the platform’s latest ad library update that was analyzed by Forbes.

    • outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Moreover, how is anyone sitting in America (or a country with American bases) primarily concerned about the Chinese government? We have endless military and culture war/ propaganda barriers erected against them; we’re basically untouchable, unless we plan on physically going to China.

      (The answer is related to the propaganda barriers themselves – it’s acceptable / encouraged to criticize China).

      • steltek
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you describe what “propaganda barriers” means? From my perspective, it’s absurdly easy for foreign governments to bot-farm posts in an attempt to sway public opinion in the US.

        And of course it’s acceptable/encouraged to criticize China. But it’s also acceptable/encouraged to criticize Joe Biden, Donald Trump, AOC, DeSantis, Obama, and on and on. There’s not really a shortage of hateful and divisive content out there right now. The rage-bait about what The Other Team just did and how America is in terminal decay are the biggest propaganda wins of all time. And news orgs, desperate for revenue in an age of digital media and ad blockers, will chase whatever is stuck in people’s heads so they fuel it even more.

        • outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, even still, the US government and corporations have by far the upper hand. They control or heavily influence the school curriculums, for starters, in addition to most news media. Essentially, the lion’s share of information that reaches most people throughout most of their lives.

          Any social media -based sway from a foreign actor will be comparatively marginal, and will be at very best at an even keel with domestic.

      • romaselli@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That is exactly why these rags have to keep publishing anti china stories nonstop. Western countries need to convince the public that China is a threat despite all you said, so they can eventually justify western aggression and still try to come off as the real victims.

    • ABC123itsEASY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re not necessarily wrong in all respects, but this comment is peak whataboutism. Western tiktok is targeted mostly at children and young adults who are obviously highly impressionable, so I would argue that regardless of whats happening on any other social media platform, this is unwanted and harmful and therefore shouldn’t be accepted.

      • charles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The difference is there is American federal policy being put in place around TikTok specifically that is not being done against other social media apps.

        • ABC123itsEASY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea when people organize an attempted coup on Chinese tiktok, your point may hold more water. Not saying it’s a good thing, but it’s clear that Facebook et al’s primary motive is not promoting nationalistic goals; domestically or aboard.

      • ghariksforge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whataboutism is the correct and logical answer to hypocrites. There is nothing that Tiktok is guilty of that Twitter or Instagram aren’t.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For sure. Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts are all functionally identical and equally concerning as TikTok in every way, and Xitter is trying to jump onto that too.

      • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are children and young adults really more impressionable than Fox news, and thereby Facebook’s, audience?

        I also don’t know that I agree with “targeted mostly at children and young adults”. There are very large parts of TikTok that would be wholly unappealing to your average kid. Not to mention that American social media started out very much targeted at children and young adults. Or have we already forgotten what the main demographics of Facebook and myspace used to be?

        The problem with whataboutism here is that these conversations pretty much always involve TikTok and rarely other platforms until it’s brought up in comments where it can be dismissed as whataboutism.

        Either they’re all a problem (it’s this one) or none of them are. We need to stop drawing arbitrary lines between offenders. It’s just giving a bunch of shit bags freedom to continue being shit bags.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are children and young adults really more impressionable than Fox news

          Fox News isn’t being paid by the Federal or State Governments to run “Ads” that attempt to put a positive spin on negative events.

          • RatMaster@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Suuuure. Not paid directly by the gov, but unless you’ve been living under a rock, everyone knows that politicians and big corporations (or in this case: Fox News) work hand in hand to push propaganda… Or like you said “put a positive spin on negative events”.

            People just like to jump on TikTok and be like CHINA BAD!. As if America was an angel lmao.

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              WTF is wrong with you? China is running ads trying to convince people that they’re not really genociding the Uyghur Muslims they’re just detaining them to send them all to school!

              As if America was an angel lmao.

              I never said it was, again WTF is wrong with you in your head? Criticizing one group doesn’t equate to support for an opposing group.

          • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Does it count when a major political party, that does that all the time, uses the money it pilfered from that government, or is that different somehow?

            What about that the only reason they’re not doing it directly from the government account is because of the safeguards against that kind of thing they haven’t pulled down yet

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              A political party is not the Government nor do their ads attempt to whitewash Government misdeeds.

              • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                A political party makes up parts of the government and uses their ads to whitewash their own actions within the government.

                This division is not at clean as you’re trying to make it

          • Historical_General@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oftentimes they’re connected to party members mate. Trump literally spoke to a bunch of their broadcasters daily.

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Was the US Federal Government paying Fox News to run ads talking about how the mass murder of American Indians was a good thing?

              No? Then GTFO out of here with this whataboutism. It’s fucking gross.

              • Historical_General@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The same people fund both the government (through elections) and the news media. I guarantee you Murdoch is friends with many of his fellow billionaires.

                L

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Facebook ran ads paid for by Russian propagandists which IMO is far worse than a Chinese company running Chinese ads.

            • Fisting for Freedom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              As an American, I can say that my government sucks for invading Iraq and Afghanistan and face no repercussions. I did so before those wars and have done so repeatedly since.

              As a Chinese citizen, I can be arrested for singing a song about Hong Kong. Or saying that Tibet isn’t China, or that Taiwan should be left alone. God forbid I ask about what’s happening in Xinjiang. Or what happened in Beijing in 1989, or why the Great Leap Forward resulted in so many deaths of my countrymen. Or practicing Flaun Dafa, or whatever else.

              Nobody is saying the US is perfect: the US has its problems, we can and should be better. But China is never honest about their shit and punishes people who are. China’s markedly worse than the US.

              • ghariksforge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They let you complain about Iraq and Afghanistan because your complaints are irrelevant. You have no power to change policy.

                • Fisting for Freedom@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I have free speech rights under the constitution. That’s not the case in China.

                  Don’t shift the goal posts - there’s a huge difference between the countries, and China is strictly worse.

                  • ghariksforge@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    China did not destroy the city of Fallujah, America did. All those speech rights did not save those people who were murdered by American soldiers.

                  • romaselli@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Free speech in the US is a giant lie that you guys tell to yourselves. People can be stripped of their US citizenships and deported even as a legally naturalized US citizen for expressing pro communist views, look it up. How is this free speech?