• Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Are you suggesting that unarmed negotiators don’t have an amazing success rate?

    They are public servants who volunteer to do a dangerous job. Considering the way they treat innocent people now, yeah I’d much rather hire competent people who are willing to do the job properly.

    • GBU_28
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d love to see a source on that. I’ve never heard negotiators are particularly effective.

      “Amazing success rate” sounds like a 75% + de-escalation rate with the offender in custody and the bomb undetonated.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Nope. I don’t have numbers. But I have seen competent, compassionate people talk desperate people out of some dire situations without harm to anyone. We should always start there. Every single time.

        Cops on the other hand must be leashed.

        • GBU_28
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I spoke to the tactical-happy nature of cops, and how that’s a serious issue. I pretty specifically constrained my area of discussion to bomb threats. I acknowledge that for other issues of less terroristic nature, a negotiator is great. (Wellness checks, domestic issues, substance issues, etc)

          Thanks for clarifying the anecdotal source though.