The association, founded in 1876, condemned legislation that would threaten librarians and other educators with criminal prosecution for possessing “obscene” material.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If hustler releases a text only version of their magazines, that should be allowed.

    In elementary schools? With children. Well that’s certainly an interesting take.

    There is no reason to restrict information.

    Strange, all sorts of other information is restricted from children by law…

    There is no reason to restrict non-sexual depictions of nudity.

    Some of these books have graphical depictions of sexual acts. I’m not sure why anyone would think that’s something important to have in a school library or programme.

    • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I said

      if the depiction supports a narrative of conflict resolution, safety, or another educational purpose.

      The article says

      “We’re seeing attempts by advocacy groups to file criminal charges against librarians and educators for books that they would like to see out of the library, and over and over again, these prosecutors decline to prosecute because there is absolutely no evidence that the books meet the most minimal standards for obscenity under the Miller Test,” she said.

      The Miller Test is the U.S. Supreme Court’s legal test to determine what works are obscene. A book, a picture or a film is classified as obscene if it “describes or shows sexual conduct in a patently offensive way” or “lacks serious literary, artistic, political, educational, or scientific value.”

      Libraries also serve highschools.

      This article is completely age appropriate for a teenager even if it’s above your reading level.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes because courts and judges never cater to the demands of their political friends. And politicians never do things for no reason other than to spite “the other side”.

        This article is completely age appropriate for a teenager

        THAT IS LITERAL PORNOGRAPHY. I FEEL LIKE I’M TAKING CRAZY PILLS.

        • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          This text is pornography? It’s candid, and it’s opinionated in that it’s pointedly describing how women’s rights are being eroded.

          With increasing attacks on reproductive rights, demand for emergency contraception among women is surging—and if guys are smart, they’ll gladly offer to cover the cost of it.

          If ever there was a near-perfect business model in the United States designed around sex, it was the pharmaceutical industry wagering on drunk and horny people engaging in wild, sloppy, unprotected porking and instantly regretting it. Since forever ago, the coital community has been making questionable decisions with even more questionable people and the outcome, at least for a time, often resulted in some snot-nosed kid that nobody wanted being brought into the world nine months later. And while abortion was once common practice in the Land of the Free, increasing laws against terminating pregnancies, including the recent reversal of Roe v. Wade, has given women fewer choices after some guy they hardly know glazes their ovaries in the heat of the moment. Thankfully, along the Walk of Shame is a local pharmacy where any adult woman can purchase emergency contraceptives, such as Plan B—aka the “morning-after” pill—eliminating any possibility that some unwanted rug rat is going to come crawling from her snatch.

          For the time being, anyway. Unfortunately, an alarming number of politicians at the state and federal level are presently dabbling in some bizarre, extremist God-fearing ethos that seems to have been stolen from Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, one that contends that women must have the babies they make, even if it was because they were raped by their drunken uncle. No doubt, right-wing politicians are waging war against emergency contraceptives, with the U.S. Supreme Court announcing recently that it plans to hear a case that could lead to a ban of the FDA-approved abortion drug mifepristone. So, a lot more women are taking advantage of Plan B while they still can. Recent research shows that demand for emergency contraception has surged in the United States in recent years, presumably because nobody with a pussy wants to take the chance of finding out they are with child, just to have Uncle Sam’s zealotry-inspired overstep force them to give birth.

          “It’s cheaper than raising a kid for the next 18 years,” Sasha, a 22-year-old student at the University of Toledo, tells HUSTLERMagazine.com.

          Of course, emergency contraceptives are certainly cheaper than bringing up children or paying 18-plus years of child support, for that matter, but these drugs are still plenty expensive. Considering that Plan B can cost as much as $50, enough clumsy copulation can break the bank for those trying to pay rent and even eat on occasion. “It was super expensive [for me] back in college,” reports Laura, a 34-year-old chef, who like a lot of women her age did some sexual exploration during those years of academia.

          This text is fine.

          The images around the text are absolutely pornography, if you can’t make the distinction between words and pictures you do need help.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I can read just fine, thank you.

            The images around the text are absolutely pornography, if you can’t make the distinction between words and pictures you do need help.

            I can make the distinction just fine but it’s completely irrelevant, considering they’re on the same page

            • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Like I said earlier…

              If hustler releases a text only version of their magazines, that should be allowed.

              How are you not following, you bring up hustler, I say the text in the magazine could be fine, and then provide a link to an example of text in hustler magazine that is fine… Do you click on every link without looking at the URL?

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                You’re intentionally avoiding my point. If you don’t intend to engage in good faith you can just stop replying to me, thank you.

                • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  What’s your point? The current laws allow for hustler magazine to be curated in a library? It doesn’t.

                  What books have graphic depictions? Do these books “lack serious literary, artistic, political, educational, or scientific value.”?

                  Is your point that even if a book has serious literary or educational value, it should still be banned? Wanting to ban things of educational or literary value is censorship. It’s a free speech issue because these books are forms of expression. Banning things with value deprives other people of that value.

                  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Do these books “lack serious literary, artistic, political, educational, or scientific value.”?

                    Yes.

                    Is your point that even if a book has serious literary or educational value, it should still be banned?

                    If the content is otherwise pornographic in nature, it has no place in public libraries.

                    Also people need to stop using the word “banned”. It’s not Fahrenheit 451 to have a discussion about what does or doesn’t belong in children’s libraries.