#JustFinished Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind by Yuval Noah Harari

I feel like he spent too much time working at being cutesy and not enough at internal consistency. It was an amusing book, however. Taken as a light historical fiction about the run-up to modern life, it’s good enough.

One example of the issues with the book follows:
He sets up the straw man of biological essentialism, then knocks it down with social consctructs.

1/3
#history #nonfiction #bookstodon #books @bookstodon

  • DThoris@dice.campOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    He posits that rascism is a foolish social construct, but that sexism is clearly natural.

    His argument is that since elephants and bonobos have matriarchal societies and since human societies are overwhelmingly (exclusively?) patriarchal, there must be a patriarchy genetic imperative. Interestingly, in his discussion of racism, he speaks for a while of the overwhelming prevalence of slavery as a custom…

    2/3
    @bookstodon@a.gup.pe #history #nonfiction #bookstodon #books

    • DThoris@dice.campOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      in all societies (even physically separated ones, the same argument he uses about sexism). However, his conclusion is the opposite: that rascism is not biologically rooted but rather is cultural. He does acknowledge that racism still abounds. So why are they different? He gives no good reason and, in fact, rebuts the popular arguments for a biological scaffold to support sexism.

      And gods, he hates the modern world.

      3/3

      @bookstodon@a.gup.pe #history #nonfiction #bookstodon #books

      • Kostyn@niagara.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        @DejahEntendu@dice.camp @bookstodon@a.gup.pe check out David Graeber and David Wengrow’s The Dawn of Everything if you want a facinating book on this kind of thing that includes a little response to Sapiens (if you haven’t come across it already).

      • Sean Bala@mas.to
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        @DejahEntendu@dice.camp @bookstodon@a.gup.pe Thanks for posting. I used to teach the book to my undergraduates for a course on big ideas. I think my problem with the book is that he is nuanced when convenient and paints in broad brush strokes when convenient. For me, the one that sticks in my teeth is his views on religion, which is simplistic and lacks any sense that religions are wide umbrellas with MANY different features. @religion@a.gup.pe

        Full disclosure: my academic background is comparative religions.

        • Sean Bala@mas.to
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          @DejahEntendu@dice.camp @bookstodon@a.gup.pe @religion@a.gup.pe It is good text to introduce students to thinking on broader time scales and about big ideas, but one needs to use it as a jumping off point rather than a destination.

          • DThoris@dice.campOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            @seanbala@mas.to @bookstodon@a.gup.pe @religion@a.gup.pe
            He definitely used an odd definition of religion. However, having just left Texas and living there during part of a rise of ChristoFascism, I have a hard time seeing any positive in religion right now.