• PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    How can you possibly say that under a video that literally showed better optimization on old cards being possible?

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Isn’t it different optimization, not better? Since it’s using different rendering techniques for older GPUs?

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Fallbacks are incredibly common. There are fall backs for Ray Tracing, for example. All of these are optimization.

        Lacking this level of optimization from the start was a sham. And Alex helped let them.get away with it.

        Thankfully the game flopped, Im sure in no small part to its inaccesibility on a larger range of hardware, so the devs lowered the functional requirements.

        Digital Foundry puts tech demo featuresets over a reasonably designed game, every single time. Nvidia relies on these narratives to push wasteful hardware.

        John and Richard are the only hosts I care about these days. Alex and Oliver have become insufferable .

        • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I still don’t know if I’d call lower settings to be optimisations. I see optimisations to be ways of making the current solution to work faster and more efficient. Swapping out a process for a “lower” one because some hardware can’t support the original is not optimisation in my books, and pedantically doesn’t follow the definition either.