• shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Conceived as a means to create money for the internet, its roots lay in an anti-establishment ethos encouraging people to live free from the existing power structure of financial institutions and governments.

    And it has failed.

    • sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Perhaps it failed were you live but many citizens started relying on it.

      Egypt - my country - is going though tough economy and government is taking draconian measures to restrict people’s access to foreign currency (to reduce imports and having incoming foreign currency all to itself).

      Crypto helped a lot of people exchange dollars and Egyptian pounds at fair price, move their savings somewhere safe, regain some ability to do online purchases among others.

      Similarly Russians traveling had to rely on crypto because obviously no bank accept rubles nor Russian debit/credit cards. Crypto may not be helping you but its helping lot of people

      • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        What are you on about? I did not say crypto has failed. I said bitcoin has failed. There’s a big difference. I use Monero all the time.

        • BobGnarley
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I love Monero. Litecoin too. Both would never have existed without bitcoin. So no, I don’t think it failed. It opened the door to all others to exist.

          • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            According to Satoshi, Bitcoin was meant to be peer-to-peer digital cash. However, with no privacy and fees as high as they are, it has failed at its objective.