From the article:

The bill’s sweeping, alleged purpose is stated in its opening sections: “returning sovereign regulatory powers to the state where those powers belong.” However, closer examination suggests that the legislation’s real intent is both narrower and potentially more profound than just upending city ordinance-making powers.

  • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Disengagement is the wrong term when “disengaging” people is a deliberate political strategy. Also your state is famous for stuffing ballot boxes. That history lingers.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I say disengaged to reflect the sentiment of giving up due to the suppression. Biden came within a million votes of winning Texas in 2020, amidst 66% voter turnout. Turnout dropped to under 50% in 2022 and Abbott/Patrick/Paxton coasted to victory. The suppression only works at the state level because the targeted voters disengaged from the process. If we had instead doubled down and gotten up to 70% turnout, we may have seen a Democratic sweep at the state level.

      • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Instead you’re ilk won on an “anyone but trump” platform, and you wonder why your voter base is disengaged.

        Get ready for that red wave.