YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago‘I can’t believe we’re having this conversation’: the states pushing for 14-year-olds to serve alcoholwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square172fedilinkarrow-up11.01Karrow-down123cross-posted to: antinatalism@lemmy.worldwisconsin@midwest.social
arrow-up1982arrow-down1external-link‘I can’t believe we’re having this conversation’: the states pushing for 14-year-olds to serve alcoholwww.theguardian.comYoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square172fedilinkcross-posted to: antinatalism@lemmy.worldwisconsin@midwest.social
minus-squarejusthach@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 year agoCan I not be upset at both? Not sure how what I said seemed like an approval of 14yo working in bars, but go off.
minus-squareLethalSmack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoIt’s cause the drinking age is such a benign issue compared to child labor. It’s serves as a distraction from the main issue at hand.
minus-squarefidodo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoI don’t think you worded it well then. You said “get a reasonable drinking age first”. The first there implies that it’s ok to have children working in bars as long as it comes after lowering the drinking age.
minus-squareChee_Koala@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIs doesn’t imply that for me at all, which indicates it might be a case of translation noise.
Can I not be upset at both? Not sure how what I said seemed like an approval of 14yo working in bars, but go off.
It’s cause the drinking age is such a benign issue compared to child labor.
It’s serves as a distraction from the main issue at hand.
I don’t think you worded it well then. You said “get a reasonable drinking age first”. The first there implies that it’s ok to have children working in bars as long as it comes after lowering the drinking age.
Is doesn’t imply that for me at all, which indicates it might be a case of translation noise.