• Throwaway
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    go have a coffee with your marketing team and just terrify them with the possibility of what’s going to happen if they don’t give you what you want.”

    Wow, thats text book racketeering and the CEO is loud and proud about it. How are the feds not slapping them with Rico charges?

    • Cyrus Draegur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      it would only be racketeering if, after Party A advises Party B about consequences, Party A then has CONTROL of whether those consequences occur.

      Party A observing that if Party B touches the hot stove then Party B shall receive second degree burns on their hand is not criminal.

      Party A whipping out a blowtorch and personally burning Party B’s hand to PUNISH Party B for touching the stove is criminal.

      Sweet Baby Inc does not control social media or news organizations.

      They do not have the means to drum up negative press over racist, sexist, or otherwise prejudiced content.

      They are a weather reporter saying “there will be rain, and if you do not want to get wet, we advise you bring an umbrella”

      at no point is it appropriate for a community to flip out and spray a weather reporter with a firehose for “threatening” to get people wet.

      • Throwaway
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        They are a weather reporter saying "there will be rain, and if you do not want to get wet, we advise you bring an umbrella

        They are the ones selling umbrellas in this case.

        Looking around, they seem to be friends of various games journalists, so by that metaphor, they also have some form of weather control, or at least know the guys who have it. Cloud seeding or whatever.

        Still feels like extortion to me.