Looks like pornhub pulls out of Texas
LMAO!
Last month, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the company that owns Pornhub to force compliance with the state’s age verification law and threatened millions of dollars in civil penalties.
My brain has actually defaulted to thinking of Ken Paxton as a particularly vile time traveling pilgrim, whose immediate response to arriving in the present day was outrage that the world had changed and a divine conviction that it was his purpose to revert the world to the puritanical Christian dominance that made him feel warm and safe in his own time.
That’s easier for me to comprehend than that an actual 21st century person has this many stupid, hateful ideas he’s willing to happily tie his name to.
Being under indictment for years causes stress?
Reminder that Laila Mickelwait (the lady responsible for the TraffickingHub movement) was secretly in possession of CSAM that was saved in her device years after it was deleted off PH, and Mike Bickle is an alleged sexual assaulter/harasser.
Somehow I read that last guy’s name as Mickle Bickle
Wow this is an actually interesting question. At first it kinda of seems ridiculous that a provider of age restricted content put the onus of said age verification onto a completed unrelated company. To say the manufacturers of devices capable of going online are the ones responsible for verifying the age of the user seems backwards, and a little unfair to the makers of the devices.
But on the other hand, they make a good point that if one company is collecting info on users to verify if they are legally old enough to view the content, and if they are required to get legal documentation to prove it, That could be a security concern. If the site collects that information from it’s users and their network gets compromised, the hacker obtains the legal documents of all of its users. However if you have your device get a certification of your age and be able to pass that cert to a site, and a hacker compromised your device, they would only get the information of that one user. In this way it would act like getting a drink wristband at a concert or large event. Instead of having to show your ID to a bunch of different people, you show it to one, and everyone else just sees that you’ve been verified of legal age without needing to see the actual ID.
On the other other hand, since personal devices are fully in the hands of the users, it would be pretty safe to assume that users will be able to trick the device into believing they are of legal age with relative ease, so it’s effectiveness might not be that great.
Idk man, this is kinda interesting.
That’d be cute to try and enforce on any self built system, general purpose laptop, Linux distro, used devices, mobile hotspots.
ISPs want to get into that game? No NAT allowable, VPNs, proxies.
Global interconnected networks cannot be dictated by a single jurisdiction. The number of variables involved are simply beyond any given entity to enforce.
Now it’s only a matter of time before Texas makes vpns illegal. Just like the UK and then Italy. Fucking fascists.
The UK made VPNs illegal?
They were taking about it at some point and they did ban encryption. I don’t live there, I just go off of what gets posted to lemmy.
