Hal-5700X@lemmy.world to Firefox@fedia.io · 1 year agoFirefox 116 releasedwww.mozilla.orgexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down10cross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showfirefox@lemmy.worldfirefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@kbin.socialfirefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up16arrow-down1external-linkFirefox 116 releasedwww.mozilla.orgHal-5700X@lemmy.world to Firefox@fedia.io · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showfirefox@lemmy.worldfirefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@kbin.socialfirefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squarerh4c6f@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoMy guess is we’ll have to modify the userchrome.css file again to put the stupid tabs back where they belong, yet again.
minus-squareyoasif@fedia.ioMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoShocking that an interface explicitly not designed to be stable changes release to release. 🤔
minus-squareAchyu@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoFirefox tabs are unstable? I’ve experienced one or two crashes in the last 2 months or so(on Android). Tho, it doesn’t seem too severe, as it showed the option for recovery
minus-squareyoasif@fedia.ioMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNo, I was responding to a comment about userChrome hacks, which are not supported.
What’s new?
My guess is we’ll have to modify the userchrome.css file again to put the stupid tabs back where they belong, yet again.
Shocking that an interface explicitly not designed to be stable changes release to release. 🤔
Firefox tabs are unstable?
I’ve experienced one or two crashes in the last 2 months or so(on Android). Tho, it doesn’t seem too severe, as it showed the option for recovery
No, I was responding to a comment about userChrome hacks, which are not supported.