It’s really not as clear-cut as that, as described in the article. She had been affiliated with the Democratic Party for a long time, and officially supported abortion rights until recently.
What it appears is that she did it all because it was the easier road to power. So she was, over all, an opportunist. She will not get reelected by her voters, but this is such the kind of behavior that Republicans glorify that she might get elected as one. I’m surprised there is no law about that: she was instituted for a reason, did not uphold the very core of her promises. She should be destituted and banned for office for life.
This is what you get when you blindly vote based on a letter in front of the candidates name.
How was anyone supposed to know she’d do a 180 on her views? It has nothing to do with the letter
Voting for someone who had a track record of doing and saying something is not ‘voting for a letter’ when they do a 180 on everything they did before.
It’s really not as clear-cut as that, as described in the article. She had been affiliated with the Democratic Party for a long time, and officially supported abortion rights until recently.
What it appears is that she did it all because it was the easier road to power. So she was, over all, an opportunist. She will not get reelected by her voters, but this is such the kind of behavior that Republicans glorify that she might get elected as one. I’m surprised there is no law about that: she was instituted for a reason, did not uphold the very core of her promises. She should be destituted and banned for office for life.
I’ll just check the opposing party’s dark money slush fund payroll, how silly of me