wnose@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 year agoSuperconductor Breakthrough Replicated, Twice, in Preliminary Testingwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksjpiolho@lemmy.jpiolho.comtechnology@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.worldnews@chat.maiion.comtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.nettechnology@chat.maiion.com
arrow-up166arrow-down1external-linkSuperconductor Breakthrough Replicated, Twice, in Preliminary Testingwww.tomshardware.comwnose@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 year agomessage-square32fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksjpiolho@lemmy.jpiolho.comtechnology@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.worldnews@chat.maiion.comtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.nettechnology@chat.maiion.com
minus-squareHumbleHobo@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI think most everything is better with superconductors, because there’s less worry about stray electricity or heat causing unnecessary failures.
I think most everything is better with superconductors, because there’s less worry about stray electricity or heat causing unnecessary failures.