For the first time in 27 years, the U.S. government is changing how it categorizes people by race and ethnicity, an effort that federal officials believe will more accurately count residents who identify as Hispanic and of Middle Eastern and North African heritage.

The revisions to the minimum categories on race and ethnicity, announced Thursday by the Office of Management and Budget, are the latest effort to label and define the people of the United States. This evolving process often reflects changes in social attitudes and immigration, as well as a wish for people in an increasingly diverse society to see themselves in the numbers produced by the federal government.

  • EatATaco
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Better?

    No, it’s still patently BS. As much as there is still persistent institutional racism, it’s much better than it has been in the past. Remember, it wasn’t all that long ago that black people couldn’t even vote and were just shut out of nearly 100% of society. Where there was outright discrimination and segregation. The Civil Rights Act was a major thing, just 60 years ago. There are plenty of people who are still alive that were adults before the CRA was passed. These things are gone in many areas directly because actions taken by the government. When i was a kid, in a pretty liberal east coast area, it was still pretty okay to be openly racist. I don’t think, as kids, most people fully grasped what that meant or what they were doing, but I see how my kids treat race now and I can see the huge improvements. And that’s not even that long ago. And this is all because there has been a push, from the government, to make schools more inclusive and to teach kids about the insidiousness of racism and it’s persistence in our society.

    So we shouldn’t talk about institutional racism because it feeds racists. Got it. I won’t ever mention it again.

    I very clearly noted from the beginning that this was about the “unnecessary exaggeration” and I explicitly noted that institutionalized racism is “still a major issue that needs to be addressed.” And you are trying to claim I’m saying don’t talk about it at all?

    Why the blatant lie about what I said? It’s like you’re just trying to be outraged.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      What has been done about institutional racism in the past 20 years? Because all I’ve seen shows it’s a hell of a lot worse now than it was in the 1990s.

      • EatATaco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is moving the goal posts. Why would I follow you to the next point if you won’t even admit the previous point was false?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          If institutional racism has gotten worse and the only things being done are performative, I stand by my claim.

          • EatATaco
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            Okay. I demonstrated your point was false by pointing to actual verifiable things. You’re just making vague claims now. So by what metric are you judging that things have gotten worse? And how does that prove the whole government is working against them now?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Again, your “actual verifiable things” are performative and we are going backward. If none of the “actual verifiable things” help then, again, I stand by my point.

              If I say I’m helping kill a mosquito on your nose by punching you in the face, I doubt you would consider me to be on your side.

              • EatATaco
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                You’re not providing any evidence of your point. I understand that you think this has happened. I’m trying to figure out how you got to that position.

                And if you’re arguing the the CRA didn’t actually do anything, then I would argue that you are woefully ill equipped to be having this debate.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I’m arguing that something that happened in the 1960s has absolutely no bearing on the government doing nothing to help with institutional racism in 2024 as it slides backward.

                  You do know that this isn’t 1964 and Lyndon Johnson isn’t the president anymore, right?

                  • EatATaco
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    It’s funny how much you are going out of your way and misrepresenting my position to avoid actually supporting yours. Do you not realize how transparent that is?