• whoreticulture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    They have these in a town I live near, they seem fine? Why are they dumb? They seem to work pretty well. It’s a different context than the video, a much smaller road but in a downtown area where there are always plenty of people walking. Obviously if someone got hit by a car, the driver would still be at fault regardless of whether or not the pedestrian has a flag.

    • vividspecter
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s mainly because it puts the responsibility on the victim rather than on fixing the infrastructure around it or actually policing bad behaviour from drivers. And that it also sends the signal that walking isn’t safe and that cars own the road, rather than the other way around.

      Cities often implement “solutions” like this, not because they are the best solution, but because it’s one that costs the least and doesn’t impact drivers at all. Rather than the actual solutions such as:

      • Lower speed limits (30 km/h or less)
      • Protected intersections
      • Traffic calming such as narrow lanes, bollards, etc
      • Smarter signaling systems that keep pedestrians and cyclists moving quickly and protected
      • Protected bike and pedestrian paths so people are kept away from cars altogether
      • Limits on car/truck size (and hood height in particular)
      • Repealing dangerous traffic laws like “right on red”
      • Enforcement of traffic laws