Edit:

  • article title update, bump not bomb jolt’
  • added comma

DENVER — An engine cover on a Boeing 737 operated by Southwest Airlines ripped open just after taking off from Denver International Airport Sunday morning.

The Houston-bound Southwest flight took off from DIA around 7:45 a.m., and returned to the airport 30 minutes later, landing safely. No injuries were reported.

  • EatATaco
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s a bad point, that’s why.

    Like with poker, you can do everything right and still end up losing. This is what happens when you deal with anything that has any type of chance involved.

    And just like the lottery. Even if you win, you just got ridiculously lucky. You still really made a bad move with the money.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      No, it’s not. If I asked you to get on a plane that had a 1 in 3 chance of crashing, would you?

      Statistically, you’d be fine. The absolute risk of a plane crash may be minimal. But if you are on a plane that is crashing, that is little consolation. That is what the commenter was pointing out. It is a valid presumption.

      If you were on a crashing plane, would you be statistically fine?

      • EatATaco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        No of course not. Noone is arguing that the statistics will protect the you, only (effectively) that it’s such a rare occurrence that you might as well just assume youll be fine.

        Saying “well some people weren’t fine!” Is a silly point. Noone is denying plane crashes occur.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Everybody who has ever died in a plane crash was also, statistically, going to be fine.

          The comment you are disputing

          Noone is arguing that the statistics will protect you.

          It relays that way. The other commenters said they don’t understand statistics, and statistics don’t work that way.

          Saying “well some people weren’t fine!” Is a silly point.

          Then why are you disputing the comment. There isn’t anything untrue or illogical in that comment. I’m genuinely scared that there are people in here that don’t understand that if you are in a crashing plane, you’re not worried about statistics. Frightening, actually.

          • EatATaco
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The comment you are disputing

            Incorrect. The comment I was responding to was about the down votes being “scary.” I’m not disputing their claim, I said it was a dumb point. It’s like challenging someone who says it’s a waste of money to play the lotto by pointing to the fact that some people have won.

            It’s true that some people have won. But its still a bad point. We are talking about the ridiculously rare exception as if it’s really worth considering.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Everyday there are thousands of Boeing flights that go off without a hitch. It’s still statically completely unlikely that anything bad will happen to you on a Boeing flight. So much so that it’s probably not even worth worrying about at all.

              But this isn’t to say that we should just let their bs slide. This is exactly why flying is so safe: we are sticklers for making sure they do everything right. If that’s going in the opposite direction, we should nip it in the bud long before it gets anywhere close to the point where you should question the safety of it.

              But, again, we aren’t even remotely close to that now. It makes no logical sense to be afraid of flying right now, even on a Boeing jet. And I would like to keep it that way which is why I think their issues need to be addressed.

              Like I said, frightening.

              • EatATaco
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I don’t follow. Even with Boeings current struggles, it’s still ridiculously safe to fly. Saying “some people have died!” in response to someone pointing out this fact - in response to someone expressing concern about the safety of flying - doesn’t make any sense, regardless of the fact that we agree it should be addressed.