• QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    3 months ago

    One commenter on X, who said their partner was on the Delta flight, reported that it “smelled horrible” and that vanilla-scented disinfectant used to mask the odor “only made it smell like vanilla s—.”

    Hahahahhaha.

    • BigFig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      INCREDIBLE stench if someone on a neighboring DELTA flight could smell the dog shit on this UNITED flight

      • fizix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        They were relating in the article about another similar event on a Delta flight that had to divert for a human passenger’s diarrhea.

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah even with code shares I don’t think Delta and United are ever the same carrier. Maybe?

        Seems unlikely though. Sky West and smaller carriers don’t usually share flights between multiple big carriers afaik.

        • WarmSoda
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Delta and United are different companies.

          • huginn@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes they are. Never said otherwise.

            Code shares are weird and if you don’t know about them you should look them up - what I’m saying is that code shares don’t get split between two major carriers as far as I know.

            So you’ll never have a flight that is both United and Delta ticketed. But you’ll often have a flight that is United and ANA ticketed. Or Delta and ItalAir

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      It must have been a truly … profound…. Smell if they weren’t able to clean it up after 2 hours and had to divert.

      • Tanoh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Diverting is really expensive for the airlines, so you know they only do it if there is no other way. So it can’t just have been a bit of a bad smell…

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Maybe there’s a formula, like cost per puke * pukers and when that exceeds the divert cost, they just go for it

    • XTL@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I can’t fathom the thinking of people who believe that adding more smell will make a bad smell better.

      • toofpic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Some smells mask smell of shit better. There’s even an old-school method of lighting and putting out the match after you did number 2: sulfur smoke kills the shittiness of ahit smell somehow

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Probably not. With the build quality of Boeing planes, the floor would probably have collapsed under the weight of the turd 😉

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sounds like someone’s poorly trained “service animal” that they brought on the plane without being crated. I think we’ve let loopholes like this exist long enough. Have a legitimate service animal you want to bring somewhere normal animals would not be allowed? Be prepared to show documentation certifying them as such. Have an emotional support animal? Fuck off. That’s not a get out of consequences free pass.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Fun fact. Other mammals besides humans can have bathroom emergencies, too.

      Those times you unexpectedly needed to diarrhea immediately and had a photo finish to a bathroom (or not)? Yeah, a dog in an airplane isn’t going to have the same luxury. Its bathroom is the floor

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The same hopefully goes for all humans to certify they are potty trained?

      Have an emotional support animal? Fuck off. That’s not a get out of consequences free pass.

      Unless this varies wildly by country, it’s not. And the major reason for your downvotes would be that this is exactly how it works already. You need paperwork to be allowed a support animal on a plane.

      • person420@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Interestingly the only paperwork you need is a document from a vet that says the animal is healthy. If the flight is more than 8 hours then you also need a document from the vet that the animal can go the entire flight without reliving itself.

        I don’t think that’s what people mean when they say “people should be required to provide documentation when bringing a service animal on a plane”.

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          However, in the specific case in question here, isn’t someone certifying that the animal can go without relieving itself the most relevant piece of documentation? 😂

          • person420@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            There’s not really enough info in the article to say for sure, but I don’t think it takes over 8 hours to fly from Houston to Seattle, so that requirement probably didn’t apply.

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      lol people defending a rich person taking up an extra seat for an animal. I’d like to see anyone here have the same attitude when their 5 hour flight gets diverted.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This was in first class, it was almost certainly someone’s purse dog that they let out of the crate and not a service animal.
      Don’t delegitimized service animals based on a whim or opinion.