This is a rebuttal by the author of the book that was the target of that recent Nature article. He’s a professor at NYU who’s been studying this for a long time
Frankly, he needs thicker skin if he wants to publish at this level
Au contraire. He’s not writing for a scientific audience, he’s writing for the NYT bestsellers audience. Thin skin somehow helps with the promotion of these books.
I’ll save you the trouble. This guy wrote a book about the harms of social media. Someone criticized it in Nature. This article is a response to that criticism.
It has links to a bunch of studies, which I did not click. But the author, though he is a professor of business ethics, does have a PhD in psychology. He seems qualified, though I only skimmed this article and haven’t read anything else.
I’ll have to read this later. This website seems sketchy to me, but I’ll have to actually read it to find out
This is a rebuttal by the author of the book that was the target of that recent Nature article. He’s a professor at NYU who’s been studying this for a long time
deleted by creator
Au contraire. He’s not writing for a scientific audience, he’s writing for the NYT bestsellers audience. Thin skin somehow helps with the promotion of these books.
asdfasfasf
I’ll save you the trouble. This guy wrote a book about the harms of social media. Someone criticized it in Nature. This article is a response to that criticism.
It has links to a bunch of studies, which I did not click. But the author, though he is a professor of business ethics, does have a PhD in psychology. He seems qualified, though I only skimmed this article and haven’t read anything else.
He seems like a smart guy, but those books sales are quite the conflict of interest. Thank you!