Local elections have a lot more impact on your day-to-day life. They’re just not covered much because the audience for them is so tiny it’s not profitable for the media to spend their time on them.
The other reason is that it builds up a roster of candidates that can use name recognition and experience to run for higher state or federal offices. For example, my state rep started off in the town council. (He’s not a progressive by any means but it’s nice having someone in office I went to high school with and whose kid is in the same school as mine.)
The problem is that at the national level, because of the FPTP voting system, they will still need to be a Republican or a Democrat.
Well okay I didn’t consider the entire picture of fptp. Having multiple options to choose from doesn’t automatically turn into a two party system, how power is divided after an election is the problem.
Because our first-past-the-post presidential system makes it so that it is exceptionally unlikely that any one not affiliated with the 2 largest parties can get any level of support at the federal level.
If we had a semi-parliamentary system where power was vested in the group that had the most votes in the assembly, you could see more jockeying for third parties at lower levels that still caucuses with one of the two primary parties. But as long as we have separate branches and a system where you have to get 50%+1 vote, we will only ever have 2 parties.
The American political system is (literally) foreign to me. Why would a party need strength in local/state offices first?
Local elections have a lot more impact on your day-to-day life. They’re just not covered much because the audience for them is so tiny it’s not profitable for the media to spend their time on them.
The other reason is that it builds up a roster of candidates that can use name recognition and experience to run for higher state or federal offices. For example, my state rep started off in the town council. (He’s not a progressive by any means but it’s nice having someone in office I went to high school with and whose kid is in the same school as mine.)
The problem is that at the national level, because of the FPTP voting system, they will still need to be a Republican or a Democrat.
FPTP sounds good on paper, but if in the end they still need >50%, doesn’t that defeat the entire point?
FPTP does sound good on paper, but for every complex problem there is a solution that is simple, fast, and wrong. Here’s the obligatory link to the CGP Grey video on the topic
Well okay I didn’t consider the entire picture of fptp. Having multiple options to choose from doesn’t automatically turn into a two party system, how power is divided after an election is the problem.
Because our first-past-the-post presidential system makes it so that it is exceptionally unlikely that any one not affiliated with the 2 largest parties can get any level of support at the federal level.
If we had a semi-parliamentary system where power was vested in the group that had the most votes in the assembly, you could see more jockeying for third parties at lower levels that still caucuses with one of the two primary parties. But as long as we have separate branches and a system where you have to get 50%+1 vote, we will only ever have 2 parties.