Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have said any threat from the United States and Israel will be met with Tehran’s reciprocal response, Iranian state TV reported.

“Any threat by the United States and the Zionist regime originating from any country will result in a proportional and reciprocal response from Iran towards the origin of the threat,” the Guards said in a statement.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Prices have already been skyrocketing this month. It went up 70 cents/gallon. Seemingly for no reason.

  • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What did Israel expect? They literally bombed an Iranian embassy- which are considered inviolable under international law. If Iran dropped a bomb on a US embassy, killing 2 generals and a bunch of civilians, what do you think we’d do?

    • lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      They wanted Iran to retaliate to force the US to get involved directly.

  • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Was the Iranian attack successful? I haven’t seen any information that the drones landed successfully.

    • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This looks like a saturation attack towards the Israeli air defense. The drones and possibly the ballistic missiles are cheaper and more numerous in comparison to the interceptors needed to destroy them. The aim is to exhaust the interceptors. So, the attack cannot be seen as a failure even if they didn’t land.

      Another thing to note is that some missiles/drones did manage to make it to the ground. Excluding some interception failures, the others were probably neglected by the air defense system. Israeli air defense is configured to neglect the projectiles that are expected to fall in unpopulated and unimportant areas. That again shows that the effectiveness of the attack cannot be judged from the number of drones/missiles that landed.

      And finally, the attack’s effectiveness depends on the loss of lives and property caused on the Israel side. However, releasing reports and footage of such destruction would be demoralizing to the Israelis. So they’re likely to downplay the attack. Meanwhile Iran is likely to exaggerate the same to look menacing and superior. So take the reports from either side with a grain of salt. The truth is likely to be somewhere in the middle.

  • S_204
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Welp, IRI succeeded in injuring a Palestinian girl and from the maps it appears they targeted the West Bank with some headed towards Al Aqsa…

    I dunno if this is the show of force Iran thought it would be. Seems pretty impotent. Hezbollah causes more damage when they rocket the North.

    Good day for Raytheon I guess. That’s about it.