There’s so much spam, and people diligently downvote. But the posts are still shown, with -53 votes or something.
When a post is clearly unwanted, could it be hidden?
There’s so much spam, and people diligently downvote. But the posts are still shown, with -53 votes or something.
When a post is clearly unwanted, could it be hidden?
I think this could have utility. But I’m in many communities that are just automatically downvoted by the people outside the community. So my communities would get even less interaction than they currently get
It would be nice to count votes only by people who are subscribers or comment in a community, but that’s probably going to be a larger lemmy feature that’s going to take time to develop
“Reddit is fun” had a feature with a vote threshold, it was something like “don’t show posts with a score lower than ___.”
This would be tremendously useful to have in Voyager. As an improvement, that setting could have a sub-setting, a list of communities where this setting does not apply.
I would probably want this in some sort of score/percentage mix. Like if a post had 15 upvotes and 20 downvotes, I would probably still want to see it as it just means it’s something controversial rather than low effort/quality. However going off of percentage alone wouldn’t work well in the beginning if it was immediately downvoted two or three times.
So probably more like:
score lower than {user_defined_low_score} AND score % less than {user_defined_low_percent}
We could also probably apply this to comment scores as well so we can avoid having to look at 2 users being petty towards each other… like what played out in one of the other replies to this comment.
This is not Reddit.
Reddit is Fun is not Reddit.
And? You think this site needs to be enshittified because a good feature was used by reddit first?
Petty comment imo.
We are a federation, not a site.
This is not discussing federation, this is discussing a feature in one specific client. One that happens to overlap with RIF a lot in terms of functionality.
A federation of what genius?
Federation
Lemmy has three types of federation:
Federation is enabled by default. You can add allowed and blocked instances, by adding a comma-delimited list in your instance admin panel. IE to only federate with these instances, add:
enterprise.lemmy.ml,lemmy.mlto the allowed instances section.Lemmy uses the ActivityPub protocol (a W3C standard) to enable federation between different servers (often called instances). This is very similar to the way email works. For example, if you use gmail.com, then you can not only send mails to other gmail.com users, but also to yahoo.com, yandex.ru and so on. Email uses the SMTP protocol to achieve this, so you can think of ActivityPub as “SMTP for social media”. The amount of different actions possible on social media (post, comment, like, share, etc) means that ActivityPub is much more complicated than SMTP.
As with email, ActivityPub federation happens only between servers. So if you are registered on
enterprise.lemmy.ml, you only connect to the API ofenterprise.lemmy.ml, while the server takes care of sending and receiving data from other instances (egvoyager.lemmy.ml). The great advantage of this approach is that the average user doesn’t have to do anything to use federation. In fact if you are using Lemmy, you are likely already using it. One way to confirm is by going to a community or user profile. If you are onenterprise.lemmy.mland you see a user like@nutomic@voyager.lemmy.ml, or a community like!main@ds9.lemmy.ml, then those are federated, meaning they use a different instance from yours.One way you can take advantage of federation is by opening a different instance, like
ds9.lemmy.ml, and browsing it. If you see an interesting community, post or user that you want to interact with, just copy its URL and paste it into the search of your own instance. Your instance will connect to the other one (assuming the allowlist/blocklist allows it), and directly display the remote content to you, so that you can follow a community or comment on a post. Here are some examples of working searches:!main@lemmy.ml(Community)@nutomic@lemmy.ml(User)https://lemmy.ml/c/programming(Community)https://lemmy.ml/u/nutomic(User)https://lemmy.ml/post/123(Post)https://lemmy.ml/comment/321(Comment)You can see the list of linked instances by following the “Instances” link at the bottom of any Lemmy page.
Fetching communities
If you search for a community first time, 20 posts are fetched initially. Only if a least one user on your instance subscribes to the remote community, will the community send updates to your instance. Updates include:
You can copy the URL of the community from the address bar in your browser and insert it in your search field. Wait a few seconds, the post will appear below. At the moment there is no loading indicator for the search, so wait a few seconds if it shows “no results”.
Fetching posts
Paste the URL of a post into your Lemmy instance’s search field. Wait a few seconds until the post appears. This will also fetch the community profile, and the profile of the post creator.
Fetching comments
If you find an interesting comment under a posting on another instance, you can find below the comment in the 3-dot-menu the link-symbol. Copy this link. It looks like
https://lemmy.ml/post/56382/comment/40796. Remove thepost/XXXpart and put it into your search-bar. For this example, search forhttps://lemmy.ml/comment/40796. This comment, all parent comments, users and community and the corresponding post are fetched from the remote instance, if they are not known locally.Sibling comments are not fetched! If you want more comments from older posts, you have to search for each of them as described above.
Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn’t work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !programming@lemmy.ml
Lmao, so after reading that did ypu figure out the answer to what you were asked?
A federation of what? It literally says it in your comment.
It’s a 1 sentence answer, just a hint since you don’t read very well.
My threshold is -10, so I wouldn’t have even written this reply if that feature existed!
Unless I felt like manually uncollapsing your comment, lol
I agree, this would be a bad setting to have before the platform fixes the broader issue.
There are lots of reasons people downvote things and for many communities it has nothing to do with that community’s content quality. Until communities can opt out of inclusion in the All list it’s just going to disappear communities for people.