• BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    You quoted the section of the report that quotes the linked articles. Apart from the transcript font used, it also links to the footnote.

      • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I quoted a section of the report that provides an example of the conduct it criticizes.

        You didn’t. You quoted the official statement of the Chinese government, which was quoted in the report. It was not an example provided by the report authors. Their examples and argument is below the quoted section. I’m not sure if you are just misunderstanding or pretending to misunderstand. But in any case, you are welcome to your opinion that the report is “bullshit”. But that is not a good argument if you want to bring someone to your way of thinking. You need more objective details for that.

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          You quoted the official statement of the Chinese government, which was quoted in the report.

          Ah, I see. What page of the report gives the authors’ version of what actually happened in those cases, or gives an example of something that could be described as kidnapping?