• vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I assume that Miami-Dade County had a reason to draft legislation like this. There weren’t political points to be gained here since this was a low profile issue until this bill made it high profile. The county wouldn’t have gone through the effort if there wasn’t a problem to be addressed.

    I could understand repealing a statewide mandate for protections if it was costing money to enforce and wasn’t seeing results. I don’t understand restricting local governments from implementing their own local protections. What harm would the protections have done?

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      They are blue areas doing good things to help their constituents. DeSantis couldn’t have that. It’s really not any deeper than that. The cruelty is the point.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Texas recently did something similar: they banned requiring water breaks for workers. It sounded like it was a political move to show they were helping businesses be more productive, even if it doesn’t really help much while still hurting the people they want to hurt.