• @Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    811 month ago

    I always click at least one wrong square on purpose, just to fuck with their training data. Most of the time it accepts it anyways.

      • @maik@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        621 month ago

        To fuck with the training data. But don’t worry, most of the time it accepts it anyways.

            • BlanketsWithSmallpox
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 month ago

              Lemmy is cool and mainstream now bucko. Have you seen the amount of shit posts on your front page lately? If not, congrats, you’ve curated your feed about as much as you probably already did on reddit too lol.

            • The Octonaut
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              Is it going to put a lot of… traffic light recognisers out of work?

              • @then_three_more@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                11 month ago

                Yes. If you count taxi drivers, lorry drivers, bus drivers, delivery drivers.

                I think mostly it’ll be the first option though, and a happy feeling from “sticking it to the man”.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Because fuck them, that’s why. Nobody, not a single person, is out there trying to make AI that will make the lives of average humans more livable. 100% of it is for corporate profit. Oh yeah, they’re gonna replace your job. And then where do you think your income will come from? It won’t. Come from anywhere. You’ll just be out of a job, no longer able to afford rent or food, but don’t worry because for a brief moment, they really maximized shareholder value. In the short term at least. And that’s all that matters anymore right?

            I don’t want to: not only work directly toward that goal, but also do it for free. There isn’t much you or I could do to stop this shit short of revolting, but if enough people were to fuck with Captchas, it would absolutely have an impact on the rate at which this tech is ruining our lives.

            • @zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              I don’t want to do a job that a machine would do better than me.

              And then where do you think your income will come from? It won’t. Come from anywhere. You’ll just be out of a job, no longer able to afford rent or food, but don’t worry because for a brief moment, they really maximized shareholder value.

              Yeah, that’s my problem, and, on a broader scale, society’s problem. When enough people get hungry, things will have to change. The alternative is…doing pointless labor that a machine could do better, just to prop up a failed system. Forced inefficiency. How depressing is that?

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Well if the two options I have are: continue being able to afford to live while doing a job that can now be done by a machine, or to just let it happen with zero safety net and let the good vibes from the naive optimism of “if enough people go hungry, then things will have to change.” I know what I’m choosing and I’m sure that will be a great comfort in that time

                • @zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Those are not your two options. Society will have to reform from technological pressure. Political activism, such as lobbying for a universal basic income, is part of this.

                  Trying to fight progress just so you can keep your shitty job helps neither you nor society. That energy would be better spent on a future that’s better for everybody.

            • The Octonaut
              link
              fedilink
              -21 month ago

              You’re not doing work for free. That’s a really weird way to look at it. You’re doing it to gain access to a service, an entirely optional one. It’s somewhat believable when people say oh, yes I have a car but I have to have a car, I’d like not to. But nobody is required to use GMail to live.

              And yes, feel free to be an AI pessimist. You could quite well be right. It seems bizarre to me however to make an effort to sabotage this one specific AI training (which might stop cars from running us down) so that you can log into something which will also be used to train AI (to sell you shit). And then posting your opinion about it here, where it will be used to train an AI.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I feel like you think you just came up with something truly groundbreaking, “You criticize society yet you live in society. Curious.” You have to believe me when I say you haven’t.

                • The Octonaut
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 month ago

                  … I don’t see how you can genuinely have understood that to be a point I was making. That’s the opposite of what I was saying. I even gave an example of how you might be forced to drive a car. Because you are in fact forced to live in society. But you are here on Lemmy so you must understand that you are not forced to use Gmail? So either you’re being disingenuous or you’re not actually reading all of what I’m posting. Given how you completely ignored the majority of my other post and went straight to “oH sO iF wE dO iT fOr 20 yEaRs”, I’m going with the latter.

          • myxi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The data collected from these tools are used to train models that detect cars and stuff with precise accuracy. Decades of data from millions of users each day. Once these are perfected, they will be sold to smart car users as auto-driving mode and what not. These services are likely going to be subscription based to maximize the profits.

            • The Octonaut
              link
              fedilink
              01 month ago

              Yes?

              Sorry I’m not sure “why?” is a difficult question. People keep explaining that is happening as if this hasn’t been happening in various forms for 20 years.

              If its “I don’t want to contribute to machine learning”, I’ve got exciting news for you about every post you are making on this site where every comment is publicly accessible and consumable.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I just don’t think many of us believe that, “it’s been happening in various forms for 20 years” is an acceptable reason to continue doing or accepting something.

                You act as if Captchas themselves weren’t created to prevent corporations from gaming the system. Like you do realize that the only reason that “every post you are making on this site blahblah” is because corporations just had to exploit the system for profit at the expense of literally everyone. Captchas don’t exist because a handful of clever coders made bots that were able to skim some profits from Google. It’s because corporations turned that into a billion dollar business. Capitalism ruins everything it wraps it’s putrid tendrils around.

                So yeah, no. “You’ve been doing it already for 20 years” doesn’t cut it for me.

                • The Octonaut
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 month ago

                  The 20 years thing was my bafflement as to why people felt the need to explain what Captchas are. Not a justification for their existence. When I ask “why” I think I’m pretty clearly not asking to have how Captchas work explained to me.

                  Putting that aside, can you explain to me how asking you to identify a traffic light is “at the expense of literally everyone”?

                  Someone was saying “they’ll train smart cars! And sell it to us as a subscription!” which I think is the same route you’re going down. But… how is that at the expense of everyone? And would not training smart cars benefit anyone? Is someone else going to do it? Is there a FOSS smart car I can contribue to? And is that FOSS going to prevent bad actors from training it to misbehave?

      • Zoot
        link
        fedilink
        101 month ago

        I mean if you think about it, you’re doing unpaid labor to prove you’re a human.

      • @JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        41 month ago

        Because assuming you are human is not so much about the correctest of selections as much as it’s about moving the cursor around the screen in imprecise, non robotic, humanly ways.

      • @ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        These are actually self taught for what is right, based on what most people click, do just for shits n giggs he’s talking about peppering the data used for verification with incorrect responses.

  • @sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    711 month ago

    Honestly, we should be paid for every CAPTCHA we complete. The amount of free labour big tech steals from us is astounding.

  • @GluWu
    link
    57
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Ever since image captchas were created, they’ve fail me 50% of the time, so I’ve spammed a lot of random shit that’s been accepted. If you get run over by an AI truck, I’m sorry.

  • @starman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    461 month ago

    I FUCKING HATE GOOGLE CAPTCHAS

    Sometimes when I’m on VPN or TOR these little fucks won’t let me in no matter what, but instead of showing error message or something, they just keep throwing new traffic lights or bicycles at me

    • @jmiller
      link
      91 month ago

      If you are using Firefox, switch your default search engine to DuckDuckGo, haven’t gotten a captcha from them once. And right in the search bar you can switch to Google if DDG isn’t doing too well on a particular search, I do end up doing that about 5% of the time.

      • @Thorny_Insight
        link
        51 month ago

        I’ve been using VPN, Firefox and DDG as default search engine for years and I’m filling captchas every single day.

        • @jmiller
          link
          11 month ago

          Huh, I’ve been using a VPN for under a year, and DDG for just a couple of months, but I haven’t had a captcha from them yet.

    • @Soggytoast
      link
      21 month ago

      A lot of times those are the backup captchas, the normal one looks at your browser history instead. Using a VPN will change your IP and throw off the history logs, or a setting on your browser

      • Nah, it’s cause you’re on an ip blacklist. While lots of people use vpns just for privacy reasons, there is also a lot of abuse from them and the ips get blacklisted frequently.

    • @RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      On its surface, it’s a good idea. Website hosts don’t want to be inundated with fake traffic and fake data inserted by bots.

      But it’s entirely unnecessary when your local library or doctor’s office is using captcha just for you to fill out a form, it’s a bit excessive because it’s highly unlikely any type of botnet would be targeting sign up fields on their sites. The attackers wouldn’t get anything out of it.

      • u/lukmly013 (lemmy.sdf.org)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Eh, not that unlikely.
        The bots just scan everything they can.

        For example, I’ve seen a guy do some testing with SSH server on default port (22). On average, there was constant 10Mbps of traffic just from the login attempts.
        I can imagine it to be similar with websites.

  • @Lenny@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    291 month ago

    I never know if I’m supposed to click the squares that have a tiny bit of the object or not. I hate the ones like this where you have to do 3-4 screens and then it fails you.

    I like some of the newer captchas where it’s like “choose the heaviest animal” and it’s trippy pics of birds, dogs, and elephants.

    • @wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      151 month ago

      It doesn’t matter because they show the images to multiple people and even shift the images around. If a square is only halfway there some people will click it, some won’t and this way you can generate some sort of heat map which is all you need to label your training data.

      • @Kusimulkku
        link
        81 month ago

        And then you’ll fail 50% of those people because fuck them, fill out more captchas you monkey

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      The secret is, it doesn’t matter.

  • @Gobbel2000@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    161 month ago

    Ever since I’ve understood that it accepts objectively wrong answers as long as it somehow seems as if you gave it some thought, I’ve made sure to hinder the accuracy of models that try to use my data.

  • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    121 month ago

    I fucking hate that scenario. Click on buses: ok, that the corner by a few pixels. Does it expect that or will it make me do another captcha?

    • @exocrinous@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      It expects you to behave like the other humans in its training sample. Just act like a neurotypical and you’ll pass the captcha. And if you can’t act like a neurotypical, then you’re fucked.

    • @sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      61 month ago

      Most of the time they already know whether you’re human or robot from your user agent string and the speed of your request. I encountered multiple layer of Captchas if I turned in my VPN and blocked all trackers.

      • @dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Then why does it fail me every other time if it knows I’m human and I don’t use a VPN? Very annoying!

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        I’ve found that using a VPN tends to get e caught in more Captcha loops than not. I think google, etc. has gotten better at knowing which swathes of IP addresses belong to VPNs. I thought that maybe it was specifically an issue with NordVPN because it had gotten so popular, so I switched to Mullvad and nope. Still get way more captchas. Still keep it on.

  • @LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    91 month ago

    If it doesn’t like your answer it doesn’t say you’re wrong. It just gives you another puzzle to solve. Even if you’re right, sometimes it gives you multiple puzzles anyway. Don’t sweat the small stuff.

  • @s_s
    link
    English
    61 month ago

    It’s mostly just making sure you move your mouse like a human.

    The test and the answer as proposed is irrelevant.

    • @zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      81 month ago

      Why does it keep asking me over and over again, then…and then other times, it doesn’t. Did I accidentally move my mouse like a robot? Several times in a row?

      • @Daxtron2@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        61 month ago

        It’s more likely your IP was flagged for a reason unrelated to the captcha so it’s giving you more challenges to verify.

  • prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 month ago

    Something about the expression on his face in that scene is so fucking funny to me. That look is just perfect for the scene.

  • @JATtho@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    11 month ago

    After 362879 wrong answers you will pass. Or after 2,0922789888×10¹³ tries if it’s a fancy 4x4 grid.