Good thing we (the US) lost the war, or this lady would probably have her own team of lobbyists running their country.

  • melpomenesclevage
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    so I dont care about biology-on a moral level; obviously its cool and I need to think about it at lunch- a life is precious for actual reasons

    and being wealthy diminishes just about all of those reasons.scientifically, there are studies that prove it. the wealthy are less intelligent less logic less compassionate less connected to the world. they dehumanize, in the terms that matter to me, themselves.

    I’m not suggesting you should get the wall the moment your income slips into six figures, but in extreme cases, where all humanity has fled, theres nothing worth keeping there. its an it. no moral wrong in killing it, at least no more than a rat.

    now, I’m not going to go around smashing rats in a hydraulic press for fun. that’s sick. but I’m only going to spend so much time doing catch and release in my pantry before I try poison or snapping their necks, because I have other fucking shit to do with my life, and I dont consider the rat worth that much fucking time.

    biionaires get coddled from every direction. if nurturing warm fuzzy feelings were going to work, they would have by now, so I’m in favor of actually fixing the problem. that means a guillotine.

    • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      and being wealthy diminishes just about all of those reasons.scientifically, there are studies that prove it. the wealthy are less intelligent less logic less compassionate less connected to the world.

      So take their money.

      they dehumanize, in the terms that matter to me, themselves.

      You dehumanize yourself when you dehumanize others.

      I’m in favor of actually fixing the problem. that means a guillotine.

      How did that work out for Robespierre?

      • melpomenesclevage
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        take their money

        money isn’t money though.

        money us the concept of deserving and promise of agency, which has been pressed so deep into them that they are stained with it, to any remaining capitalist loyalists or other idiots.

        you can take their money, but that isn’t really taking their money. youd need to take their faces, their names, their fingerprints, And the memories of all their secret stashes or things they could use to authenticate to associates. which seems way more fucked than just killing them.

        dehumanize yourself

        in what ways? ive been through an amount of shit, already skewed pretty far from default. might not be in a way that matters to me. hell, if you could lower my very human chance of breast cancer, I might even be willing to do something I find unpleasant.

        generally I agree, but you need to be more specific here. maybe if I salt half as many people arguing half as much for the dignity and humanity of the unhoused and laboring classes, it would be easier to rake this shit seriously, but I’m not going to devote a second more than necessary to dealing with billionaires, and in a revolution, that means a bullet.

        Robespierre

        that fucker’s problem was trying to autocratically lead a movement of popular power while keeping the people infantilized. nothing wrong with killing the aristocracy.

        • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          money isn’t money though.

          Pretty sure money is money, and you can take it.

          in what ways?

          It makes you the type of person who can dismiss the humanity of other humans as “other” and we know what kind of atrocities that leads to.

          half as many people arguing half as much for the dignity and humanity of the unhoused and laboring classes

          What about universal human dignity applying universally takes away the right of dignity from the unhoused?

          Human dignity isn’t a zero-sum game. That’s billionaire thinking.

          Take billionaires’ assets, not their lives (post-fact).

          • melpomenesclevage
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            if money were money, the stock market wouldn’t exist.

            if money were money, Donald trump would be a beggar in a gutter.

            if money were money, the wealthy would pay taxes.

            if money were money, you could do a revolution with the power of gold.

            its not, he’s not, they dont, and you can’t.

            universal human dignity

            why? based on what? at what point(s) does it start applying? at what point(s) does it stop?

            what if I go into a coma. total vegetative state.

            what if, in that vegetative state, my brain starts to physically die, which parts would I need still biologically functioning (though no longer effectively being a brain) to qualify?

            if I take a shit, there are human cells in that. does it deserve dignity?

            if I die, that’s human. does it deserve less dignity if it gets burned, or when the blood is switched out for embalming fluid?

            what about another animal just as intelligent and just as capable of feeling as us, maybe more? say an elephant, a whale, a cuttlefish?

            what about a hypothetical uploaded mind? or a from-scratch agi; what traits would it have to have to acquire various degrees of human dignity, and not just be a script/dataset for me to copy+paste+delete at my whim?

            if you think about it, and make it more than some mystical magical woowoo bullshit, some things are going to have at least a talon/tentacle/hoof in that aren’t ‘human’ and some things are going to be out that appear very much ‘human’, and maybe even were in the past.

            most if my criteria for giving a shit are things you are scientifically proven to lose with wealth. are they recoverable? maybe, in the way you can unmix a drink. and in an ideal world, maybe we should. we dont live in an ideal world. the labor cost and risk to others whose humanity is at risk (from dying) takes precedence; its a triage thing.

            and if it’s happening; I might as well enjoy it. revenge can feel nice, even if its usually stupid and counterproductive.

            • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              based on what?

              Being Human

              at what point(s) does it start applying?

              First breath; fetuses aren’t people

              at what point(s) does it stop?

              It doesn’t.

              what about a hypothetical uploaded mind?

              Getting a bit off topic your advocacy of murdering people after their wealth has been seized

              in an ideal world, maybe we should.

              Why the hell advocate violence if not to effect ideals?

              • melpomenesclevage
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                being human

                which is what?

                first breath

                why?

                it doesn’t

                okay so when I die where does that dignity go? my writings? my body, my soul?

                because your version of this idea sounds anawful lot like a soul.

                getting a bit off topic

                no I’m not, you just can’t answer because you haven’t thought out your ideas. I don’t even think they’re inherently bad, I think youre just wearing them like an aesthetic.

                • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  being human
                  which is what?

                  A supernatural comedy drama on BBC3

                  why?

                  What are you, a toddler? You asked for a cutoff and I gave you one. If you didn’t want an answer, don’t ask.

                  okay so when I die where does that dignity go? my writings? my body, my soul?
                  because your version of this idea sounds anawful lot like a soul.

                  What’s your point? I never mentioned “a soul” as it relates to human dignity but if even you seem to be using it as equivalent to or allegory for writings so what if it does sound like that?

                  Like you seem to be trying to sculpt my position to some preconceived notion you have of organized faith so you can then attack that when I have never mentioned religion.

                  I just said you shouldn’t murder people once you’ve already seized “their” assets.

                  • melpomenesclevage
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    see I don’t respect the BBC.

                    what makes that cutoff meaningful? seems arbitrary. explain why its not?

                    is my corpse deserving of dignity? the computer program? the whale?

                    I’m saying you have essentialized ‘human’ and designated it special, without any explanation (or appreciation) of why it’s special or cool. it sounds an awful lot like ‘the thing I am is special because I’m one’. which sounds pretty Fucking religious to me.

                    so explain. feel free to get weird with it.

                    I’m also saying you can’t sieze all their assets. money isn’t just money, and its not the only thing that’s money.