The researchers will present their research next week at the Black Hat cybersecurity conference in Las Vegas.

Christian Werling, one of the three students at Technische Universität Berlin who conducted the research along with another independent researcher, said that their attack requires physical access to the car, but that’s exactly the scenario where their jailbreak would be useful.

“We are not the evil outsider, but we’re actually the insider, we own the car,” Werling told TechCrunch in an interview ahead of the conference. “And we don’t want to pay these $300 for the rear heated seats.”

The technique they used to jailbreak the Tesla is called voltage glitching. Werling explained that what they did was “fiddle around” with the supply voltage of the AMD processor that runs the infotainment system.

“If we do it at the right moment, we can trick the CPU into doing something else. It has a hiccup, skips an instruction and accepts our manipulated code. That’s basically what we do in a nutshell,” he said.

With the same technique, the researchers said they were also able to extract the encryption key used to authenticate the car to Tesla’s network. In theory, this would open the door for a series of other attacks, but the researchers said they still have to explore the possibilities in this scenario.

The researchers said they were also able to extract personal information from the car such as contacts, recent calendar appointments, call logs, locations the car visited, Wi-Fi passwords and session tokens from email accounts, among others. This is data that could be attractive to people who don’t own that particular car, but still have physical access to it.

Mitigating the hardware-based attack that the researchers achieved is not simple. In fact, the researchers said, Tesla would have to replace the hardware in question.

Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why not just have the seats as a base model feature?

    I can understand having one wiring harnesses, and having two types of seats, but otherwise you’d need to charge twice the cost of the feature to break even.

    • bobs_monkey
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why not just have the seats as a base model feature?

      Because then you can’t charge something ridiculous for it

    • fneu@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it’s still more expensive to install the heated seats for everyone then to not install them at all. And most people don’t need them. So if it was a base feature then the car would be more expensive for everyone.

      So now they let the people that bought the upgrade pay for everyone’s heated seats - which is less expensive then it would be if heated seats were only installed in their cars.

      I’m not saying that it’s the right thing to do, but it does make the car cheaper for everyone.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s not how it works for any manufacturer. They charge you for the heated seats whether you use them or not.

        Do you seriously think that they just give away parts hoping that enough users need it to pay for it and cover the cost?

    • shinjiikarus@mylem.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Twice of the much lower cost, due to economies of scale … which may/should still be significantly less than building two - and more, for more features - factory lines and risk not selling a car for a longer time, since it doesn’t have the right feature combination.