• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s strange though, because Ubisoft on paper should be something I hate, but when I actually play one (and I’m a single player gamer), they’ve got fun gameplay, and the store, although it is there, generally keeps out the way and when I accidentally press the button in the menu that goes into it, there’s nothing I’d ever consider handing over actual money for. The game never points you at it, or makes you feel it’s needed.

    I don’t even know who it’s for. Who buys cosmetics in a single player game? It genuinely feels like it’s just been put in to appease the beancounters.

    That said I don’t get excited enough to buy them at full price, and normally wait until they’re on PSPlus or something. There’s nothing in most of these AAA games to truly love. They’re a sea of merely “alright”, and they’re all way too long.

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s nothing in most of these AAA games to truly love. They’re a sea of merely “alright”, and they’re all way too long.

      But why bother with alright when there’s thousands of highly regarded indie games out there for a quarter of the price?

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        The largest issue with indie games is simply discoverability. I’m sure there are tons of amazing indie games out there. But you need to wade through a sea of complete fucking garbage to get to them. Meanwhile, AAA studios can spend thousands of dollars on marketing. Unless an indie game goes viral, there’s very little chance that I’ll ever hear about it in order to consider buying it.

        • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Meanwhile, AAA studios can spend thousands of dollars on marketing.

          I don’t really get the notion of listening to some marketing department lying through their teeth. It’s not like AAA games ever deliver on their marketing promises.

          Unless an indie game goes viral, there’s very little chance that I’ll ever hear about it in order to consider buying it.

          You don’t have to go dumpster diving in order to find awesome games, somebody already did. A good starting point is the top rated games list for Steam: https://steamdb.info/stats/gameratings/

          90% of them are indies and there is something for everyone on those 3 pages.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That’s honestly what astounds me sometimes, but I guess it makes sense. There’s heart, soul, and passion in an indie game made by a small team.

        AAA games fall victim to the “designed by committee” sameness and just-good-enough gameplay.

    • detinu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s nothing in most of these AAA games to truly love. They’re a sea of merely “alright”, and they’re all way too long.

      Captures Ubisoft’s philosophy on one sentence. But it’s what makes them money, so they’ll keep doing it.

    • EatATaco
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Character creation in single player games is often a big thing and considered in a lot of reviews. I played a lot of midnight suns, and while I would never actually buy any cosmetic stuff, I definitely liked unlocking the skins and had ones I particularly liked. I even changed up once in a while. I would think even in multiplayer games, people aren’t generally buying the skins for other people, but because they like to look that way.

      It comes as no surprise that single player cosmetics is a source of revenue.

    • not_amm@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      To be honest, Ghost Recon: Breakpoint was the most mid, regular, non-surprising game I’ve played in years. I know they tried later to make it better, but it was just so empty and repetitive, like The Division 2.

      Wildlands surprised me multiple times, Breakpoint only made me ask myself multiple times: why is this not possible?, why do I have to do this all over again?, why do we have vehicles if most of the places can’t be reached normally?

      Also, The Division 2 was incredibly boring. I really want to like it, but I have to repeat the same things over and over, and you don’t even get good rewards, farming is boring and doesn’t compensate the time spent, at least not like in The Division 1 and its incursions, you were at least guaranteed something.

      I haven’t bought any game from Ubisoft after TD2 and Breakpoint. I can already spend time in those games if I want the ubisoft experience. I