During a recent interview, the actress also explains why she doesn’t consider herself a movie star.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why does everything need a sequel? That movie was great all on its own, one of the few standalone sci fi movies made in recent years. Why do we need another? Is advertising a new movie that expensive that the marketing team needs to ride some else’s coattails to get results?

    • harpuajim@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Cruise doesn’t make bad movies so if they want to do a sequel then I’m all for it.

      • LEX
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        Cough cough The Mummy cough

        • uphillbothways@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          I thought it had been largely agreed upon that Mr. scientology middle-tooth jump-on-Oprah’s-couch serial-abusive-husband ruins everything he touches. I’ve actively avoided movies he had any involvement with for like two decades now, so I don’t have any knowledge of more recent work… Legend (1985) was pretty good, but Ridley Scot, Tim Curry and Mia Sara carried that film.

            • Moohamin12
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              Maverick was pretty good.

              Unfortunate but he does make good action films.

            • decadentrebel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Even his “smaller” projects were good - Jack Reacher, American Made, heck Oblivion was decent despite getting mixed reviews and not a huge moneymaker by Cruise standards.

            • uphillbothways@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              The way in which and how heavily they were marketed turned me off of every one of them before they hit screens. Honestly, I’ve never seen a fast and furious film for the same reason. The harder someone tries to sell something, the more I have to wonder why the product can’t stand on its own.

              • Delphia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                I love people who have never seen the F&F movies. Because it starts off as good flashy dumb action that ABSOLUTELY MUST go bigger than last time.

                I’m a car guy, I loved them so much. But even I reached a point where I was like “This shit is so fucking dumb” and stopped watching.

                I find it interesting as to when people felt the need to tap out.

          • Delphia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Id argue the opposite… kinda.

            Its the fact that he makes really excellent movies is the only reason I watch them despite me being very against Scientology. Edge of Tomorrow is one of the best scifi movies of recent times.