• AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s an example of Hunter profiting off of his father’s name. It has fuckall to do with Joe because he doesn’t have to be involved for Hunter to profit off of his name unethically, or for Hunter to sell the idea of access. That doesn’t make it okay!!! Jesus fucking Christ!

    • Unaware7013@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It has fuckall to do with Joe because he doesn’t have to be involved for Hunter to profit off of his name unethically

      I don’t know if you’re just talking out your ass or what, but this is by far the dumbest take I’ve heard on this issue.

      The fact that Joe wasn’t involved is absolutely relevant when the narrative is that Hunter sold access to Joe. If no actual access was sold, as we know is the case, this is just a nothingburger because the right, as everyone who is paying attention can see, is just making up more bullshit to try to attack the president and distract attention away from the ACTUAL FUCKING CRIMINAL PRESIDENT that’s currently working on a 4th or 5th indictment.

      This is just a circus, and people like you are absolutell clowns.