Vivaldi (and Edge) have this absolutely wonderful capability that allows me to split one tab into two or four at the same time.

At least in my workflow it’s quite useful because I usually work with several tabs open and sometimes two related tabs (say, a document I’m reading and a document I’m replying to according to that one), I know that I can perfectly have another Firefox window open next to it and fulfill that function, but I wish I could do it directly from Firefox.

Does anyone know of an add-on that fulfills this purpose? Or maybe a dev who is developing it?

  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The minute Firefox adds this and tab stacking, im gonna switch to it and never look back (although I would also miss workspaces). For now only Vivaldi has the features I need

  • boerbiet@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the feature I miss most in Firefox, aside from tab stacking. I used Opera (before Blink days) and later Vivaldi for a long time and tehese features almost made me go back. Me not wanting to use a Chromium based browser was the only thing stronger than that.

    I’ve given up hope on ever getting these features in Firefox by now.

    • Qwerty-Space@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think that’s the same thing.

      Tab tiling means having two or more tabs open at once, so that both can be worked on at the same time.

  • Jomn@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there also something in Firefox that works like Vivaldi workspaces ? Between that, tiling and tab stacking, I really have a hard time using anything else than Vivaldi at work.

  • reflex@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I was looking into this because of the whole WEI thing and Vivaldi being part of the Chromium ecosystem—I found a tiling plugin for the 'fox, but visually, it’s not seamless like Vivaldi’s.

    Each tile still looks like its own window complete with the tab space up top.

    • doc@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      FYI, Vivaldi posted their opposition to WEI here. If website operators use the scheme then browsers not implementing it are at a loss. Hopefully every chrome based project (including edge!) is able to remove it so Chrome official is the only one where it works. Starving the approach of participants sounds like the only easy to make it fail.

      • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        While that’s definitely where we need to aim, chrome has such a massive market share even if all the non chrome browsers band together it might not be enough.

        I can see banks and employment sites implementing these things and forcing the hand of the smaller browser. I hope I’m wrong, but that seems likely.

      • yesdogishere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        the only thing google chrome is good for is destroying humanity. everything they do now has an ulterior motive to benefit themselves. just like apple and MS.

        • doc@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Edge uses pieces of Chrome, so it will probably have the same WEI stuff unless MS chooses to remove it. Given the goals of MS probably aligns more closely with Google than other browser makers I think it’s likely edge will have WEI.

  • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it really that different from having multiple windows? I don’t understand why it is such a important feature that others in the thread make it out to be. Feels like I am missing some details, just curious on what the actual difference is.

    • halvar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Workarounds are generally bad in most software situations. Yes we could tile the windows instead of the tabs, but

      • We would have to put them all back in one window when exiting to get them saved
      • Alternatively we could use profiles, but that’s a hassle on startup.
      • It probably eats up more resources
      • If we wanted to relocate our “Firefox workplace” to somewhere else (let’s say another monitor) we would have to drag multiple windows.
      • On linux some window managers are just not there with tiling yet (and they might never be).
      • Also it looks bad and is a workaround to something that should just be. Hope I didn’t miss anything, and you sir have a nice day :)
      • WereCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Also if you could easily tile multiple windows it would use significantly more screen real estate as each separate window will have its own top bar

  • 18107@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m still waiting on tab stacks before I switch completely. I’m also slightly disappointed that Vivaldi only has 2 levels of tab stacks. I would absolutely use more levels if I could.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you need 2+ tab stacks, I think you would rather need a tab group manager, like Simple Tab Groups. It does not support nested groups, but you may be able to imitate it with “folder names” in the group name, or there might be better such addons too.
      Honestly, I don’t see how 2+ rows of tabs (+stacks) would fit on screen

  • Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just curious: Vivaldi devs are always very keen in telling everyone how much they modify chromium to fit their privacy standards. Are they worse than Firefox?

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a very broad question. They have some advantages, like built in ad-blocker (firefox only has tracker blocker) with customizable lists, no analytics except basic user counting.

      Firefox in theory has the advantage of being open source though I doubt anyone has independently taken it upon themselves to audit the code base of a whole browser, without payment.